...
首页> 外文期刊>Marine policy >The maintenance costs of marine natural capital: A case study from the initial assessment of the Marine Strategy Framework Directive in France
【24h】

The maintenance costs of marine natural capital: A case study from the initial assessment of the Marine Strategy Framework Directive in France

机译:海洋自然资本的维护成本:以法国《海洋战略框架指令》的初步评估为例

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

There are two ways of assessing the costs of environmental degradation: as the costs associated with the loss of benefits resulting from the degradation of natural capital, and as the maintenance costs required to compensate for the actual or potential degradation of natural capital. The first of these methods is based on the Total Economic Value (TEV) of benefits forgone because of the depletion of ecosystem services delivered by marine biodiversity. The second method is based on the costs required to maintain a good state of marine biodiversity, one which makes it possible to deliver ecosystem services. This paper gives an illustration of this second approach. It details how these maintenance costs have been calculated in the initial assessment of the Marine Strategy Framework Directive (MSFD) in France. It addresses nine problem areas - corresponding to nine sources of environmental degradation - from non-native invasive species to oil spills. It gives a total figure for these degradation costs (around 2 billion Euros). The results are compared with those of other Member States who have taken similar approaches in the context of the MSFD. One key conclusion is that it is not really possible to make meaningful comparisons at this stage, since the methods of data collection and the nature of the costs are verv different The need to develoD such assessments in a standardised wav is noted.
机译:有两种评估环境退化成本的方法:作为与自然资本退化导致的利益损失相关的成本,以及作为补偿实际或潜在自然资本退化所需的维护成本。这些方法中的第一种是基于海洋生物多样性所提供的生态系统服务枯竭而放弃的收益的总经济价值(TEV)。第二种方法基于维持良好的海洋生物多样性状况所需的成本,这使提供生态系统服务成为可能。本文举例说明了第二种方法。它详细介绍了如何在法国对《海洋战略框架指令》(MSFD)进行初步评估时计算出这些维护成本。它解决了从非本地入侵物种到溢油事故的9个问题领域-对应于9个环境恶化的根源。它给出了这些降级成本的总额(约20亿欧元)。将结果与在MSFD中采取类似方法的其他成员国的结果进行比较。一个关键的结论是,由于数据收集的方法和成本的性质是完全不同的,因此在此阶段实际上不可能进行有意义的比较。注意到需要在标准化的波形中进行此类评估。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Marine policy》 |2014年第11期|37-47|共11页
  • 作者单位

    IFREMER, UMR AMURE, Marine Economics Unit, Centre de Brest, ZI Pointe du Diable, 29280 Piouzane, France;

    IFREMER, UMR AMURE, Marine Economics Unit, Centre de Brest, ZI Pointe du Diable, 29280 Piouzane, France;

    Universite de Brest, UMR AMURE, IFREMER, Centre de Brest, ZI Pointe du Diable, 29280 Plouzane, France;

    Marine Protected Area Agency, 16 Quai de la Douane CS 42932, 29229 Brest Cedex 2, 29200 Brest, France;

    IFREMER, UMR AMURE, Marine Economics Unit, Centre de Brest, ZI Pointe du Diable, 29280 Piouzane, France;

    ECOWHAT, 99 Rue Duhesme, F-75018 Paris, France;

    Universite de Brest, UMR AMURE, IFREMER, Centre de Brest, ZI Pointe du Diable, 29280 Plouzane, France;

    ECOWHAT, 99 Rue Duhesme, F-75018 Paris, France;

    Universite de Brest, UMR AMURE, 29334 Quimper Cedex, France;

    IFREMER, UMR AMURE, Marine Economics Unit, Centre de Brest, ZI Pointe du Diable, 29280 Piouzane, France;

    Universite de Brest, UMR AMURE, 29334 Quimper Cedex, France;

    Institut du Developpement Durable et des Relations Internationales, 41, rue du Four 75006 Paris, France;

    Marine Protected Area Agency, 16 Quai de la Douane CS 42932, 29229 Brest Cedex 2, 29200 Brest, France;

    IFREMER, UMR AMURE, Marine Economics Unit, Centre de Brest, ZI Pointe du Diable, 29280 Piouzane, France;

    IFREMER, UMR AMURE, Marine Economics Unit, Centre de Brest, ZI Pointe du Diable, 29280 Piouzane, France;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Maintenance cost; Marine ecosystems; Marine Strategy Framework Directive; Economic analysis;

    机译:维修费用;海洋生态系统;海洋战略框架指令;经济分析;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号