首页> 外文期刊>Marine ecology >Skin toxins in coral-associated Gobiodon species (Teleostei: Gobiidae) affect predator preference and prey survival
【24h】

Skin toxins in coral-associated Gobiodon species (Teleostei: Gobiidae) affect predator preference and prey survival

机译:珊瑚相关的戈比登物种(Teleostei:戈壁科)中的皮肤毒素影响捕食者的偏好和猎物的生存

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Predation risk is high for the many small coral reef fishes, requiring successful sheltering or other predator defence mechanisms. Coral-dwelling gobies of the genus Gobiodon live in close association with scleractinian corals of the genus Acropora. Earlier studies indicated that the low movement frequency of adult fishes and the development of skin toxins (crinotoxicity) are predation avoidance mechanisms. Although past experiments showed that predators refuse food prepared with goby skin mucus, direct predator-prey interactions have not been studied. The present study compares the toxicity levels of two crinotoxic coral gobies - Gobiodon histrio, representative of a conspicuously coloured species, and Gobiodon sp. 3 with cryptic coloration -using a standard bioassay method. The results show that toxin levels of both species differ significantly shortly after mucus release but become similar over time. Predator preferences were tested experimentally in an aquarium in which the two gobies and a juvenile damselfish Chromis viridis were exposed to the small grouper Epinephelus fasciatus. Video-analysis revealed that although coral gobies are potential prey, E. fasciatus clearly preferred the non-toxic control fish (C. viridis) over Gobiodon. When targeting a goby, the predator did not prefer one species over the other. Contrary to our expectations that toxic gobies are generally avoided, gobies were often captured, but they were expelled quickly, repeatedly and alive. This unusual post-capture avoidance confirms that these gobies have a very good chance of surviving attacks in the field due to their skin toxins. Nonetheless, some gobies were consumed: the coral shelter may therefore also provide additional protection, with toxins protecting them mainly during movement between corals. In summary, chemical deterrence by crinotoxic fishes seems to be far more efficient in predation avoidance than in physical deterrence involving body squamation and/or strong fin spines.
机译:许多小型珊瑚鱼的捕食风险很高,需要成功的庇护所或其他捕食者防御机制。 Gobiodon属的珊瑚虾虎鱼与Acropora属的巩膜珊瑚密切相关。较早的研究表明,成鱼的低运动频率和皮肤毒素的产生(犯罪毒性)是避免捕食的机制。尽管过去的实验表明,捕食者拒绝用虾虎鱼皮肤黏液制备的食物,但尚未研究直接捕食者与猎物之间的相互作用。本研究比较了两种具有剧毒作用的珊瑚虾虎鱼的毒性水平-代表显着颜色的物种戈氏斑Go(Gobiodon histrio)和戈比顿菌(Gobiodon sp。)。 3具有隐秘的着色-使用标准生物测定方法。结果表明,粘液释放后,两种物质的毒素水平显着不同,但随着时间的流逝变得相似。在一个水族箱中对捕食者的偏好进行了实验测试,其中两个虎虾和一个幼小雀鲷Chromis viridis被暴露在小石斑鱼Epinephelus fasciatus中。视频分析显示,尽管珊瑚虾虎是潜在的猎物,但筋膜大肠埃希菌显然比戈比登(Gobiodon)更喜欢无毒的对照鱼(C. viridis)。当瞄准虾虎鱼时,捕食者并不喜欢一个物种。与我们通常避免使用有毒虎虾的期望相反,通常会捕获虾虎,但它们会被迅速,反复地活着驱逐。这种异常的避免捕获后操作证实了这些虾虎鱼由于皮肤毒素而在野外遭受袭击的机率很高。尽管如此,还是消耗了一些虾虎鱼:珊瑚庇护所因此也可能提供额外的保护,毒素主要在珊瑚之间移动时保护它们。总之,在避免捕食方面,用触毒鱼类进行的化学威慑似乎要比在涉及体鳞和/或强鳍刺的物理威慑中更有效。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号