...
首页> 外文期刊>Margin: The Journal of Applied Economic Research >The Impact of the Australian Carbon Tax on Industries and Households
【24h】

The Impact of the Australian Carbon Tax on Industries and Households

机译:澳大利亚碳税对工业和家庭的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

With the new Australian Government and various interest groups objecting to the Australian carbon tax, public opinion about pricing carbon is divided. Some of the disagreement may be due to misunderstandings about the effects of the policy. In an effort to clarify some of the issues, this article reports the simulated effects of a carbon tax of A$23 per tonne of carbon dioxide on different economic agents, with and without a compensation policy. We employ a computable general equilibrium (CGE) model with an environmentally extended social accounting matrix (SAM). At the sectoral level, brown coal electricity, black coal electricity and the brown coal mining sectors are big losers. The effect on various employment occupations is mildly negative, ranging from -0.6 per cent to -1.7 per cent, with production and transport workers worst affected. According to household utility projections, low-income households suffer more from a carbon tax and benefit more from the proposed compensation policy. However, the commonly used equivalent variation (EV) tends to reverse this conclusion.
机译:随着新澳大利亚政府和各利益集团反对澳大利亚碳税,关于碳定价的公众意见分歧。某些分歧可能是由于对政策效果的误解。为了澄清一些问题,本文报告了在有或没有补偿政策的情况下,每吨二氧化碳征收23澳元的碳税对不同经济主体的模拟影响。我们采用具有环境扩展的社会核算矩阵(SAM)的可计算一般均衡(CGE)模型。在部门层面,褐煤电力,黑煤电力和褐煤采矿业是最大的输家。对各种就业职业的影响是轻微的负面影响,从-0.6%到-1.7%不等,生产和运输工人受到的影响最大。根据家庭公用事业的预测,低收入家庭遭受碳税的影响更大,并从拟议的补偿政策中受益更多。但是,常用的等效变化量(EV)往往会推翻这一结论。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号