...
首页> 外文期刊>Margin: The Journal of Applied Economic Research >Socio-economic Patterns in Inpatient Care Utilisation in India: Is the Income Effect Withering?
【24h】

Socio-economic Patterns in Inpatient Care Utilisation in India: Is the Income Effect Withering?

机译:印度住院医疗利用的社会经济模式:收入效应正在消亡吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Though a few studies are available with regard to socio-economic differentials in health care utilisation in India, no attempt has been made to understand the underlying decision-making process in health care utilisation. Therefore, in this article, an attempt is made to examine the utilisation of inpatient care in India, focusing on the socio-economic determinants of the extent of inpatient care use. The health care utilisation model adopted by Manning et ah, (1987, American Economic Review, 77(3), 251-77), and Pohlmeier and Ulrich (1995, The Journal of Human Resources, 30(2), 339-61) was employed for studying the above objective. Cross-sectional data are taken from National Sample Survey Organization's 60th round (2004) survey on 'morbidity and health care'. While a two-part (double-hurdle) model is estimated for the frequency of hospitalisations, a zero-truncated negative binomial regression model is applied for the length of stay (LOS) in a hospital. The results suggest that controlling other factors, people from richer households were more likely to seek hospital admission and use inpatient care more frequently than their poorer counterparts, consistent with the supposition that rich people have greater access to health care. However, the analyses suggest that with respect to income, equity has been achieved for the LOS in the hospital for individuals suffering from various diseases. This means that income inequity exists at the time of hospital admission but once they are admitted, the duration of stay at hospital is no longer determined by their economic status. However, this requires careful interpretation because it is quite likely that poor people may have been forced to sell off assets or borrow money for meeting the cost of hospitalisation for longer duration of stay. The above argument is strengthened by the fact that when socio-economic status is measured by education, inequity continues to persist, with illiterates having longer LOSs in the hospital. The policy measure that the government could take to improve the access of quality health care services for the poor is to strengthening the public health system through enhanced investments in the National Health Mission.
机译:尽管在印度医疗保健利用方面的社会经济差异方面已有一些研究,但并未尝试了解医疗保健利用中的基本决策过程。因此,在本文中,我们试图检查印度住院医疗的使用情况,重点是住院医疗使用范围的社会经济决定因素。 Manning等(1987,美国经济评论,77(3),251-77)以及Pohlmeier和Ulrich(1995,人力资源杂志,30(2),339-61)所采用的卫生保健利用模型被用来研究上述目标。横截面数据取自国家样本调查组织(National Sample Survey Organization)的第60轮(2004)关于“发病率和医疗保健”的调查。虽然针对住院频率估计了一个分为两部分(双重障碍)的模型,但对医院的住院时间(LOS)应用了零截断的负二项式回归模型。结果表明,在控制其他因素的情况下,较富裕的家庭相比,较富裕的家庭更有可能寻求入院和更频繁地使用住院治疗,这与富裕人口享有更多医疗保健的假设相一致。但是,分析表明,就收入而言,已为患有各种疾病的个人在医院的LOS中实现了公平。这意味着入院时存在收入不均,但一旦入院,住院时间就不再由其经济状况决定。但是,这需要仔细的解释,因为很可能穷人被迫变卖资产或借钱来支付住院时间更长的住院费用。当通过教育衡量社会经济地位时,不平等现象继续存在,文盲住院时间更长,这一事实进一步证明了上述观点。政府为改善穷人获得优质医疗服务的机会而采取的政策措施是,通过增加对国家卫生特派团的投资来加强公共卫生系统。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号