首页> 外文期刊>Manufacturing and service operations management >Mechanism Design for Managing Hidden Rebates and Inflated Quotes of a Procurement Service Provider
【24h】

Mechanism Design for Managing Hidden Rebates and Inflated Quotes of a Procurement Service Provider

机译:管理隐藏折扣和采购服务提供商的膨胀报价的机制设计

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Problem definition: When sourcing through a procurement service provider (PSP), the PSP often collects rebates from unethical manufacturers in developing countries (as referral fees) that are "hidden" from the retailers. Recognizing that a PSP has a strong incentive to solicit quotes from unethical manufacturers, we examine a situation in which the retailer insists on soliciting a quote from a manufacturer designated by the retailer and a separate quote from an unethical manufacturer selected by the PSP. However, when the designated manufacturer is ethical, the PSP has an incentive to inflate the quote from this ethical manufacturer in order to help the unethical manufacturer to win. Facing this situation, is there a mechanism for the retailer to control hidden rebates? Academic/practical relevance: The issue of hidden rebates is a "known secret" in global supply chain practice. Also, hidden rebates increase the customs duty for U.S. importers because of the first sales rule for customs valuation of U.S. imports. Therefore, there is a need to understand the implications of hidden rebates and to control this unethical practice. Methodology: To circumvent the issue of hidden rebates and quote inflations, we develop a deterministic, incentive-compatible mechanism that is based on a simple selection rule (for selecting a manufacturer) and a contingent service fee (as a reward for the service provided by the PSP). Results: Our optimal mechanism creates incentives to (1) deter the PSP from inflating the quote submitted from the ethical manufacturer, (2) reduce the incidence of hidden rebates, and (3) reduce the retailer's procurement cost and the corresponding import tax significantly. More importantly, relative to the "lowest quote wins" selection rule, the optimal mechanism is Pareto-improving for the retailer and the service provider when the hidden rebate is below a certain threshold. Furthermore, we extend our analysis to the case in which (1) the retailer is not sure whether the designated manufacturer is ethical or not, (2) the retailer does not know the exact value of hidden rebate (but it follows a two-point distribution), and (3) the retailer may verify the quote with its designated manufacturer before a formal contract. We also explore the stochastic incentive-compatible mechanism for the cases in which the penalty is unenforceable or enforceable. Managerial implications: When law enforcement is inconsistent in developing countries, retailers should beware of the existence and implications of hidden rebates. We provide a simple mechanism that a retailer can consider as a practical way to deter the PSP from inflating certain quotes and put hidden rebates under control.
机译:问题定义:通过采购服务提供商(PSP)进行采购时,PSP通常收集来自发展中国家(作为“隐藏”的不道德制造商的折扣,这些制造商是从零售商那里“隐藏的”。认识到PSP具有强大的激励,征求不道德制造商的引用,我们研究了零售商坚持请求零售商指定的制造商的报价以及来自PSP的不道德制造商的单独报价的局面。然而,当指定的制造商是道德的时,PSP有激励从这家道德制造商造成引用,以帮助不道德的制造商获胜。面对这种情况,是有零售商控制隐藏折扣的机制吗?学术/实际相关性:隐藏折扣问题是全球供应链惯例的“已知秘密”。此外,隐藏的折扣由于美国进口海关估值的第一个销售规则,增加了美国进口商的海关。因此,需要了解隐性回扣的影响并控制这种不道德的实践。方法论:为了规避隐藏的回扣和引用通量的问题,我们开发了一个确定性的激励兼容机制,该机制是基于简单的选择规则(用于选择制造商)和或有服务费(作为提供的服务的奖励PSP)。结果:我们的最佳机制为(1)妨碍PSP从道德制造商提交的报价造成了PSP,(2)减少隐藏折扣的发生率,(3)减少零售商的采购成本和相应的进口税。更重要的是,相对于“最低报价胜利”选择规则,当隐藏的回扣低于特定阈值时,最佳机制是对零售商和服务提供商的改善。此外,我们将我们的分析扩展到哪种情况(1)零售商不确定指定的制造商是否是道德的,(2)零售商不知道隐藏回扣的确切值(但它遵循两点分布)和(3)零售商可以在正式合同之前与其指定制造商核实报价。我们还探讨了惩罚无法执行或可执行的案例的随机激励兼容机制。管理含义:当行为在发展中国家不一致时,零售商应该谨防隐藏回扣的存在和影响。我们提供了一种简单的机制,零售商可以认为可以将PSP妨碍某些报价并在控制下放置隐藏的折扣。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号