首页> 外文期刊>Manufacturing and service operations management >Optimal Capacity Conversion for Product Transitions Under High Service Requirements
【24h】

Optimal Capacity Conversion for Product Transitions Under High Service Requirements

机译:在高服务要求下实现产品转换的最佳容量转换

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

We consider the capacity planning problem during a product transition in which demand for a new-generation product gradually replaces that for the old product. Capacity for the new product can be acquired both by purchasing new production lines and by converting existing production lines for the old product. Furthermore, in either case, the new product capacity is "retrofitted" to be flexible, i.e., to be able to also produce the old product. This capacity planning problem arises regularly at Intel, which served as the motivating context for this research. We formulate a two-product capacity planning model to determine the equipment purchase and conversion schedule, considering (ⅰ) time-varying and uncertain demand, (ⅱ) dedicated and flexible capacity, (ⅲ) inventory and equipment costs, and (ⅳ) a chance-constrained service-level requirement. We develop a solution approach that accounts for the risk-pooling benefit of flexible capacity (a closed-loop planning approach) and compare it with a solution that is similar to Intel's current practice (an open-loop planning approach). We evaluate both approaches with a realistic but disguised example and show that the closed-loop planning solution leads to savings in both equipment and inventory costs and matches more closely the service-level targets for the two products. Our numerical experiments illuminate the cost trade-offs between purchasing new capacity and converting old capacity and between a level capacity plan versus a chase capacity plan.
机译:我们考虑产品过渡期间的容量规划问题,其中对新一代产品的需求逐渐替代了对旧产品的需求。可以通过购买新生产线或通过将现有生产线转换为旧产品来获得新产品的产能。此外,在任一种情况下,新产品的生产能力都被“改造”以具有灵活性,即也能够生产旧产品。英特尔经常会出现这种容量规划问题,这是本研究的动机所在。我们制定了两种产品的产能计划模型,以确定设备的购买和转换时间表,其中考虑了(ⅰ)时变和不确定的需求,(ⅱ)专用且灵活的产能,(ⅲ)库存和设备成本以及(ⅳ)a机会受限的服务水平要求。我们开发了一种解决方案方法,该方法考虑了灵活容量的风险分担优势(一种闭环计划方法),并将其与类似于英特尔当前实践的解决方案(一种开环计划方法)进行了比较。我们用一个现实的但变相的例子来评估这两种方法,并表明闭环计划解决方案可以节省设备和库存成本,并且更紧密地匹配两种产品的服务水平目标。我们的数值实验阐明了在购买新容量和转换旧容量之间以及在水平容量计划与追逐容量计划之间的成本权衡。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号