首页> 外文期刊>Managerial Auditing Journal >The audit expectation gap: evidence from Lebanon
【24h】

The audit expectation gap: evidence from Lebanon

机译:审计期望差距:来自黎巴嫩的证据

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Purpose – The audit expectation gap has been examined in many regions of the world, but the extent of such a gap has not been investigated in many Middle-Eastern countries. This study attempts to assess the possible existence of an expectation gap between accountants and non-accountants in Lebanon. Design/methodology/approach – Survey research was conducted on a sample of accountants and non-accountants and comparisons made. Findings – A significant “reasonableness gap” was uncovered. There is a gap between the auditors' understanding of their profession compared with the perceptions of others. There is a significant difference in perceptions of the role of the auditor in respect of fraud detection. Neither group had a strong image of the Lebanon profession compared with worldwide audit practices or with the technical qualifications of the auditors. Research limitations/implications – This research can be extended through assessing whether there are differences between different non-accountants (judges, lawyers, bankers, brokers, etc.) in terms of their understanding of the role of external auditors. Practical implications – Much more concerted effort needs to be exercised from professional syndicates and other relevant stakeholders in developing the image of the profession and addressing the varying perceptions and attitudes towards it. Originality/value – This paper adds evidence to the important debate about expectation gap from a region that has had little coverage.
机译:目的–已在世界许多地区检查了审计期望差距,但是在许多中东国家尚未调查这种差距的程度。这项研究试图评估黎巴嫩会计与非会计之间预期差距的可能存在。设计/方法/方法–对会计师和非会计师的样本进行了调查研究,并进行了比较。调查结果–发现了重大的“合理性差距”。与其他人的看法相比,审计师对其职业的理解之间存在差距。在欺诈检测方面,对审计师角色的认识存在显着差异。与世界范围内的审计实践或审计员的技术资格相比,这两个组织都没有对黎巴嫩职业有深刻的印象。研究的局限性/意义–通过评估不同的非会计师(法官,律师,银行家,经纪人等)之间是否对外部审计师的作用有所了解,可以扩展这项研究。实际意义–在发展行业形象并解决对行业的不同看法和态度时,需要专业协会和其他相关利益相关者做出更大的努力。原创性/价值-本文为有关覆盖率极低的区域的预期差距的重要辩论提供了证据。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号