首页> 外文期刊>Management services >Does Technology Enhance or Restrict Productivity?
【24h】

Does Technology Enhance or Restrict Productivity?

机译:技术是否提升或限制生产率?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

A review of economic history indicates that humans have successfully produced more of the goods and services they require the most. It was Adam Smith who in 1776, first recognised that the role played by specialisation and the division of labour as the prime means of achieving economic growth. Smith correctly saw that the division of labour would improve productivity when he defined the three advantages: workers perfected specific skills; they avoided the delay and distraction of switching from one task to another; and they would use or even invent specialised equipment to improve the efficiency of the task. Today, many workers especially clerical, would not fit easily into Adam Smith's picture of three specific skills. Most of us do not use specialised equipment: we use computers capable of doing a multitude of things from accountancy to instant messaging by email, letter writing etc. Most office tasks do not have a clear production flow; they are a mish mash of tasks and activities.
机译:对经济历史的审查表明,人类已成功生产更多的商品和服务。 它是亚当史密斯在1776年,首先认识到,专业化和劳动分工作为实现经济增长的主要手段。 史密斯正确地看到,当他定义了三个优势时,劳动力将提高生产力:工人完善的特殊技能; 他们避免了从一项任务转换到另一个任务的延迟和分散注意力; 他们将使用甚至发明专业设备以提高任务的效率。 今天,许多工人尤其是文职人员,不容易进入亚当史密斯的三种特定技能的图片。 我们大多数人都不使用专业设备:我们使用能够通过电子邮件,信件写入等即时通信的计算机从事会计的众多东西。大多数办公室任务没有明确的生产流程; 他们是一个磨碎的任务和活动。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Management services》 |2021年第2期|13-13|共1页
  • 作者

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号