...
首页> 外文期刊>Management Review Quarterly >Two decades of cognitive bias research in entrepreneurship: What do we know and where do we go from here?
【24h】

Two decades of cognitive bias research in entrepreneurship: What do we know and where do we go from here?

机译:关于企业家精神的认知偏见研究的二十年:我们知道什么,我们从哪里去?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Abstract The study of entrepreneurial cognitive bias emerged about two decades ago and has received growing attention in entrepreneurial research. However, this is the first comprehensive review of the studies published in this field and therefore describes the current state of the art of cognitive bias research in entrepreneurship. This paper identified a total of 54 relevant articles and structures them by a typology of bias. It shows that a considerable number of articles cover overoptimism and overconfidence, while limited attention has been given to other biases such as illusion of control, the belief in the law of small numbers, escalation of commitment, planning fallacy, status quo bias, self-serving bias, and hindsight bias. Results of this review show that studies examining overoptimism and overconfidence have delivered most consistent results. The focus of the review lies on logically structuring the body of research by assessing the key issues in the determinants and in the consequences of each bias and thereby identifying a range of new research opportunities. Special emphasis was placed on incorporating insights from conceptual papers.
机译:摘要创业认知偏向的研究始于大约二十年前,并在创业研究中受到越来越多的关注。但是,这是对该领域发表的研究的首次全面综述,因此描述了企业家精神方面的认知偏差研究的最新状态。本文共确定了54篇相关文章,并根据偏见类型对其进行了结构化。它表明,相当多的文章涵盖了过度乐观和过度自信,而对其他偏见的关注有限,例如控制幻觉,对小数律的信仰,承诺的升级,计划谬误,现状偏见,自我偏见。服务偏见和事后偏见。该评价的结果表明,研究过度乐观和过度自信的研究提供了最一致的结果。审查的重点在于通过评估决定因素中的关键问题以及每种偏见的后果,从而从逻辑上构建研究的主体,从而确定一系列新的研究机会。特别强调将概念文件的见解纳入其中。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号