...
首页> 外文期刊>Management Review Quarterly >Eight tips and questions for your bibliographic study in business and management research
【24h】

Eight tips and questions for your bibliographic study in business and management research

机译:八个提示和对业务和管理研究中的书目研究的提示和问题

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Management Review Quarterly (MRQ) specializes in systematic literature reviews, meta analyses, replication studies, and bibliographic studies. Previous editorials published in MRQ provide authors with guidelines for performing systematic (narrative) literature reviews (Fisch and Block 2018) and replication studies (Block and Kuckertz 2018). In this editorial, we focus on bibliographic studies and outline eight tips that help authors to improve their bibliographic studies. In contrast to systematic literature reviews, meta analyses, and replication studies, little information on best practices and guidelines exist on bibliographic studies (also known as bibliographic literature reviews). Over the last years, we saw a steady increase in the number of bibliographic studies submitted to MRQ. We attribute this rise to the better accessibility of bibliographic data and software packages that specialize in bibliographic analyses. Another antecedent of the increasing prevalence of bibliographic studies is the ongoing differentiation of business and management research into narrowly defined subdisciplines, which calls for studies that are interdisciplinary and 'break the walls'. Well-conducted bibliographic studies can break those walls. They structure a field and detect links between disciplines, identify topic clusters, literature gaps and academic silos, and show the most impactful authors and their research. Yet, in contrast to narrative literature reviews, bibliographic literature reviews use quantitative and statistical methods to achieve this goal.
机译:管理审查季刊(MRQ)专门从事系统文献评论,元分析,复制研究和书目研究。在MRQ发表的以前的编辑提供了具有执行系统(叙事)文献评论(FISCH和2018年框)和复制研究(街区和Kuckertz 2018)的指导方针。在这方面,我们专注于书目研究和概要八个技巧,帮助作者改善他们的书目研究。与系统文献评论,元分析和复制研究相比,关于书目研究存在的关于最佳实践和准则的信息,(又称书目文献审查)。在过去几年中,我们看到提交给MRQ的书目研究数量稳步增加。我们将这一增长归因于专业从事书目分析的书目数据和软件包的更好可访问性。越来越多的书目研究患病率的另一种先行是对狭隘定义的细长纪律的业务和管理研究的持续分化,这需要跨学科和“打破墙壁”的研究。良好的书目研究可以打破这些墙壁。它们构建一个字段并检测学科之间的链接,确定主题集群,文学差距和学术孤岛,并显示最有影响力的作者及其研究。然而,与叙事文学评论相比,书目文献评论使用定量和统计方法来实现这一目标。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Management Review Quarterly》 |2020年第3期|307-312|共6页
  • 作者单位

    Faculty of Management Trier University 54296 Trier Germany Erasmus School of Economics Erasmus University Rotterdam P.O. Box 1738 3000 DR Rotterdam The Netherlands Wittener Institut fuer Familienunternehmen (WIFU) Universitat Witten/Herdecke Alfred-Herrhausen-Str. 50 58448 Witten Germany;

    Faculty of Management Trier University 54296 Trier Germany Erasmus School of Economics Erasmus University Rotterdam P.O. Box 1738 3000 DR Rotterdam The Netherlands;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号