...
首页> 外文期刊>Management research review >Antecedents and consequences of managerial decision-making styles in the Arabian Gulf
【24h】

Antecedents and consequences of managerial decision-making styles in the Arabian Gulf

机译:阿拉伯海湾管理决策风格的前提和后果

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose - This paper aims to examine managerial decision-making approaches, their antecedents and consequences in the Arabian Gulf context. Using recent survey data, the study offers a critical assessment of prevailing myths about decision-making styles in the Arabian Gulf. Design/methodology/approach - Survey data were collected from a sample of 432 managers working in public and private sector companies in the United Arab Emirates (UAE). A combination of statistical techniques including confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and hierarchical regression analysis was used to test research hypotheses. Findings - The findings of this study question the myth that UAE or Gulf managers mostly pursue consultative and participative styles of management. Most UAE managers continue to practice an autocratic and a pseudo-consultative style of decision-making, undermining the value of employee input in the decisionmaking process. The data revealed a strong negative relationship between autocratic management style and a range of personal and organizational outcomes such as job satisfaction, organizational commitment, organizational citizenship behavior, performance and innovative human resource management practices pertaining to work-family life balance and diversity programs. Most employees perceived autocratic management style as a major source of job stress, absenteeism and turnover. Socio-demographic characteristics of managers and their work organizations, considered as antecedents of decision-making styles, played a limited role in shaping decision-making approaches or their consequences. Globalization and associated socio-cultural changes that UAE and other Gulf region countries have experienced over the past two decades seem to have only a marginal impact on decision-making styles. Research limitations/implications - Use of perceptual survey data places some constraints on the generalizability of our findings. Future research may address this issue with multiple data sources including an in-depth case study. Practical implications - The findings of this research should be of special interest to both domestic and multinational companies in seeking alignment of their management approaches with the emerging competitive business environment in UAE and other Gulf countries. Theoretically, the paper documents the value of the continuum theory of managerial behavior in UAE and the Arabian Gulf context. Originality/value - The study represents a first major effort to develop and test a comprehensive conceptual model of antecedents and consequences of managerial decision-making styles in UAE, which may be extended to other countries in the Arabian Gulf region. The value-added contribution of the study may be seen in its critical analysis of prevailing beliefs and assumptions about management practices in the Arabian Gulf.
机译:目的 - 本文旨在审查阿拉伯海湾背景下的管理决策方法,他们的前一种和后果。该研究提供了最近的调查数据,对阿拉伯海湾的决策风格的普遍神话提供了批判性评估。设计/方法/方法 - 从阿拉伯联合酋长国公共和私营部门公司(阿联酋)的公共和私营部门公司的432名经理样本中收集了调查数据。包括确认因子分析(CFA)和分层回归分析的统计技术的组合用于测试研究假设。调查结果 - 这项研究的调查结果质疑阿联酋或海湾经理大多追求咨询和参与风格的管理。大多数阿联酋管理人员继续练习专制和伪协商的决策风格,破坏决策过程中员工投入的价值。该数据揭示了专制管理风格与一系列个人和组织成果之间的强烈负面关系,如工作满意度,组织承诺,组织公民行为,绩效和创新的人力资源管理实践,与工作 - 家庭生活平衡和多样性计划相关。大多数员工认为是专制管理风格作为工作压力,旷工和营业额的主要来源。经理和工作组织的社会人口统计特征被认为是决策风格的前言,在塑造决策方法或后果方面发挥了有限的作用。阿联酋和其他海湾地区国家在过去二十年中经历的全球化和相关的社会文化变化似乎只对决策方式产生了边际影响。研究限制/影响 - 感知调查数据的使用对我们的研究结果的普遍性施加了一些限制。未来的研究可以通过多种数据来源解决此问题,包括深入的案例研究。实际意义 - 本研究的调查结果应对国内和跨国公司寻求与阿联酋和其他海湾国家的新出现的竞争商业环境保持一致的管理方法。从理论上讲,本文记录了阿拉伯联合酋长国和阿拉伯海湾背景下的管理行为的连续性理论的价值。原创性/价值 - 该研究代表了制定和测试阿联酋的管理决策风格的全面概念模型的首要努力,这可能扩展到阿拉伯海湾地区的其他国家。在阿拉伯海湾的管理实践的普遍信仰和假设的批判性分析中,可以看到该研究的增值贡献。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号