首页> 外文期刊>Management Decision >A 'new' view on 'traditional' strategic alliances' formation paradigms
【24h】

A 'new' view on 'traditional' strategic alliances' formation paradigms

机译:对“传统”战略联盟形成范式的“新”看法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Purpose - This paper seeks to argue that managers need to apply a holistic and long-term approach in their understanding of strategic alliances' paradigms to inform decisions. Owing to the complexity of strategic alliance scenarios it is often a difficult task for management to know what information is required in order to take such decisions. It is suggested here that six widely used motivational paradigms in the formation of interorganisational relationships (transaction cost economics, resource dependence, strategic choice, stakeholder theory, organizational learning, and institutional theory) can be used not only during the formation stages of alliances but also during an alliance's lifecycle to help in decision making.rnDesign/methodology/approach - The paper proposes a discussion of possible shortcomings in the literature on motivational paradigms based on a review of the pertinent literature and, with the help of previously published cases/examples, suggests a new conceptual perspective of the paradigms. Findings - The paper explains how and why motivational paradigms could be viewed as an interrelated web of issues throughout a strategic alliance's entire lifecycle - and not just at their formation stage when, often, they are used singly and in isolation of one another. It is proposed that their continuous and holistic use contributes to a manager's awareness of possible issues and helps his/her strategic management and decision taking. This new perspective is presented conceptually in a model.rnPractical implications - For decision makers and managers: the proposed perspective will enhance their management and decision-taking processes by increasing their awareness and acting as an aide-memoire of issues they need to consider/investigate and will reduce the possibility of alliance failure. For educators, it will expand the scope of traditional alliance formation paradigms and inform their teaching and research.rnOriginality/value - This is a novel approach to a traditional theory that expands its scope and usefulness.
机译:目的-本文旨在争辩说,管理者在理解战略联盟的范例以为决策提供依据时需要采用整体和长期的方法。由于战略联盟方案的复杂性,管理层通常很难知道要进行此类决策所需的信息。建议在组织间关系的形成中使用六个广泛使用的动机范式(交易成本经济学,资源依赖,战略选择,利益相关者理论,组织学习和制度理论),不仅可以在联盟的形成阶段使用,而且可以使用设计/方法/方法-本文在回顾相关文献的基础上,结合先前发表的案例/示例,提出了关于动机范式的文献中可能存在的缺陷的讨论,提出了范式的新概念视角。调查结果-本文解释了动机范式如何以及为什么可以被视为整个战略联盟整个生命周期中相互联系的问题网-不仅是在其形成阶段,通常它们被单独使用并且彼此孤立地使用。建议连续和整体使用它们有助于经理了解可能出现的问题,并有助于其战略管理和决策。实用的含义-对于决策者和管理者:提出的观点将通过提高认识和充当需要考虑/调查的问题的助手来增强其管理和决策过程。并减少结盟失败的可能性。对于教育者来说,它将扩大传统联盟形成范式的范围并为他们的教学和研究提供信息。原创性/价值-这是对传统理论的一种新颖方法,可扩展其范围和实用性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号