首页> 外文期刊>Lighting Research & Technology >Comparison of electronic and conventional ballasts used in roadway lighting
【24h】

Comparison of electronic and conventional ballasts used in roadway lighting

机译:道路照明中使用的电子镇流器与常规镇流器的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Although manufacturers recommend light-emitting diode technology for all types of urban lighting, it is likely that high-pressure sodium lamps will be used for roadway lighting for many years. The purpose of this paper is to establish whether electronic ballasts represent a better solution for such lamps than electromagnetic ballasts. Special attention was devoted to the fact that electronic ballasts allow considerably higher voltage drops. However, taking into account the earth-fault protection demands, it is shown that electronic ballasts provide only a modest possibility to increase the length of the street lighting section. The techo-economic analysis showed that, owing to the high prices and shorter life of electronic ballasts, conventional electromagnetic control gear still represents a better choice from the financial point of view.
机译:尽管制造商建议将发光二极管技术用于所有类型的城市照明,但高压钠灯很可能会在道路照明中使用很多年。本文的目的是确定电子镇流器是否比电磁镇流器更适合此类灯。电子镇流器允许更高的电压降,这一事实引起了人们的特别关注。但是,考虑到接地保护的要求,表明电子镇流器仅提供了增加路灯部分长度的适度可能性。技术经济分析表明,由于电子镇流器的高价格和较短的使用寿命,从财务角度来看,常规电磁控制装置仍然是更好的选择。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Lighting Research & Technology》 |2014年第4期|407-420|共14页
  • 作者

    A Djuretic; M Kostic;

  • 作者单位

    Minel-Schreder Luminaire Factory, Zemun, Serbia;

    Faculty of Electrical Engineering, University of Belgrade, Bulevar kralja Aleksandra 73, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号