首页> 外文期刊>Library Review >Academic scientists' scholarly use of information resources in the digital environment: Perceptions and barriers
【24h】

Academic scientists' scholarly use of information resources in the digital environment: Perceptions and barriers

机译:学术科学家在数字环境中对信息资源的学术使用:知觉和障碍

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Purpose - The purpose of this study is to investigate the academic scientists' scholarly use of information sources, the disciplinary differences in their use and the barriers encountered, particularly while using journals. Design/methodology/approach - A quantitative research design based on the survey method was used to achieve the objectives of this study. A self-administered questionnaire was distributed to all the academic staff of three disciplines - science, life sciences and pharmacy. Together, they constituted 24 departments of the University of the Punjab. This oldest and largest public sector university was selected as a sample. Findings - The findings showed that e-journals, e-reports and online reference sources were frequently used. The disciplinary differences were found with regard to the use of e-journals and e-books. Users of e-journals lacked skills of advanced searching and were not able to determine the quality of e-journals. Respondents faced certain barriers in usage such as payment of e-joumal articles not available through the Library, slow internet speed and lack of information literacy instructions program. Originality/value - Previous researchers conducted studies that were focused mostly on the academic scientists' perceptions and the extent of electronic information sources' use. Researchers in Pakistan mostly examined students and research scholars' use of electronic information sources and very few studies were conducted to investigate academic scientists' scholarly information seeking behavior. This study is valuable, as it investigated the scholarly use of information sources by academic scientists and particularly disciplinary differences in their use, digital literacy skills and the barriers encountered while using e-joumals.
机译:目的-这项研究的目的是调查学术科学家对信息源的学术使用,使用方面的学科差异以及遇到的障碍,特别是在使用期刊时。设计/方法/方法-基于调查方法的定量研究设计用于实现本研究的目标。一份自我管理的调查问卷已分发给科学,生命科学和药学这三个学科的所有学术人员。他们共同组成了旁遮普大学的24个系。这所历史最悠久,规模最大的公立大学被选为样本。调查结果-调查结果表明,经常使用电子期刊,电子报告和在线参考资源。发现在使用电子期刊和电子书方面存在学科差异。电子期刊的用户缺乏高级搜索的技能,因此无法确定电子期刊的质量。受访者在使用过程中遇到了一些障碍,例如无法通过图书馆获得电子期刊文章的付款,互联网速度缓慢以及缺乏信息素养指导计划。原创性/价值-先前的研究人员进行的研究主要集中在学术科学家的看法和电子信息源的使用范围。巴基斯坦的研究人员主要检查了学生和研究学者对电子信息资源的使用,很少进行研究来研究学术科学家的学术信息寻求行为。这项研究非常有价值,因为它调查了学术科学家在学术上对信息源的使用情况,尤其是在使用,数字素养技能以及使用电子期刊时遇到的障碍方面的学科差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号