首页> 外文期刊>Liability, Risk & Insurance >Supreme Court in 'claimants must be honest' shocker
【24h】

Supreme Court in 'claimants must be honest' shocker

机译:最高法院的“申诉人必须诚实”令人震惊

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Here is some good news for the solicitors' professional indemnity market on issues of causation, which had been stretched via the lower court decision in this case. The Supreme Court, in Perry v Raleys Solicitors [2019] UKSC 5, has affirmed the now rather old judgment in Allied Maples Group Ltd v Simmons & Simmons [1995] 1 WLR1602 and added a modern touch. The court confirmed that a lost litigation claim is no different from any other claim for the loss of a chance, which is refreshing. When pursuing a lost opportunity claim, the claimant is still required to establish factual causation; that is, he would have been able to make an honest (if not necessarily successful) claim if the proper advice had been given.
机译:对于因果关系问题,这是律师的专业赔偿市场的一些好消息,在本案中,这些因果关系是通过下级法院的判决而得到解决的。最高法院在Perry诉Raleys Solicitors [2019] UKSC 5一案中,确认了Allied Maples Group Ltd诉Simmons&Simmons [1995] 1 WLR1602案中相当古老的判决,并增加了现代感。法院确认,诉讼损失索赔与其他机会丧失索赔没有什么不同,这令人耳目一新。在寻求损失的机会索赔时,仍然要求索赔人建立事实因果关系;也就是说,如果给出了正确的建议,他本可以提出诚实(如果不一定成功)的主张。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号