首页> 外文期刊>Leisure Studies >Contemporary sport sociology and ancient Greek athletics
【24h】

Contemporary sport sociology and ancient Greek athletics

机译:当代体育社会学与古希腊竞技

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Situated at a point of critical intersection between leisure and labour, ancient athletics was in the most essential respects just as complex and 'modern' as its contemporary counterpart and can thus benefit from the methods of contemporary sport sociology, which can in turn find in ancient Greece a useful comparandum. As with contemporary sport, athletic pursuits must be situated within the broader economy of leisure in ancient Greece. However, a process of professionalisation gradually developed during the fifth century bce, turning athletics into what was arguably a form of labour. While many continued to derive their pedigree from the elite 'leisure class' that almost exclusively dominated the sixth century athletics, a growing number came from less-distinguished families, their inclusion rendered possible by the construction of public gymnasia, private patronage, cash prizes for victory and other forms of social advancement. Some scholars have pointed to this development as an index of democratisation, but I will argue that it was actually a continuation of elite hegemony by appropriation of the commercial and artisanal classes, parallel to what can be observed in the expansion of athletic participation in the late nineteenth century. Along with expanding the talent pool, the pressure to produce the best athletes for inter-state competition led to a professionalisation and broadening of athletic training: originally informal and paederastic, it eventually became institutionalised and regulated by the state. Extension of elite privilege to a few successful athletes ultimately served to confirm the Panhellenic prestige and thus also the domestic power of each city's hegemonic class.
机译:古代竞技运动位于休闲与劳力之间的关键交汇点,与现代竞技运动一样,在最重要的方面同样复杂且“现代”,因此可以从现代体育社会学方法中受益,而现代体育社会学方法又可以在古代希腊是一个有用的比较。与现代体育一样,体育运动必须位于古希腊更广泛的休闲经济中。然而,在公元前五世纪,职业化过程逐渐发展,将竞技运动转化为一种劳动形式。尽管许多人继续从几乎完全统治第六世纪田径运动的精英“休闲班”中获得血统书,但越来越多的人来自不太杰出的家庭,但由于公共体育馆的建设,私人赞助,现金奖励的出现,他们的加入成为可能。胜利和其他形式的社会进步。一些学者指出,这种发展是民主化的指标,但是我认为这实际上是对商业和手工阶级的挪用,这是精英霸权的延续,这与后期运动参与的扩大可以看出十九世纪。随着人才库的扩大,为州际比赛培养最好的运动员的压力导致了运动训练的专业化和扩大化:最初是非正式的和充满爱国精神的,最终由国家制度化和规范。精英特权的授予给了一些成功的运动员,最终证明了泛希腊的声望,因此也证实了每个城市霸权阶层的家庭力量。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号