...
首页> 外文期刊>Leadership >Leadership effectiveness and the problem of social action: Continuing the conversation between Burns and Rost
【24h】

Leadership effectiveness and the problem of social action: Continuing the conversation between Burns and Rost

机译:领导效力与社会行为问题:继续伯恩斯与罗斯特之间的对话

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

While calling for the need to continue engaging in conversation with differing understandings of leadership effectiveness, the author demonstrates what this could look like in practice by conversing with three leadership authors, Hannah Arendt, from the field of Political Theory, James McGregor Burns from the disciplines of Political Science and American History, and Joseph C Rost, from the field of Education Administration/Leadership. In this article, the author seeks to understand differing and contradictory notions of leadership effectiveness as they are proposed by Burns and Rost. Following Arendt, the author (a) distinguishes the nature of action as understood by Burns (acting as making) and Rost (acting as initiating), (b) outlines the dominant influence of acting as making' or homo-faber image of leadership within the discipline of leadership studies, and (c) considers the implications of including acting as initiating' for leadership learning and education.
机译:在呼吁有必要继续以不同的领导才能理解进行对话的同时,作者通过与政治理论领域的三位领导者汉娜·阿伦特(Hannah Arendt),学科领域的詹姆斯·麦格雷戈·伯恩斯(James McGregor Burns)进行了对话,展示了实践中的情况。教育行政/领导力领域的政治科学和美国历史学博士以及约瑟夫·C·罗斯特(Joseph C Rost)。在本文中,作者试图理解伯恩斯和罗斯特提出的领导效能的不同和相互矛盾的概念。继阿伦特之后,作者(a)区分了伯恩斯(扮演)和罗斯特(扮演发起)所理解的行动的本质,(b)概述了扮演“制造”或同质领导形象的主要影响领导力研究的学科,并且(c)考虑包括作为领导力学习和教育的“开始”的含义。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号