首页> 外文期刊>The Leadership & Organization Development Journal >The smart leader: examining the relationship between intelligence and leader development behavior
【24h】

The smart leader: examining the relationship between intelligence and leader development behavior

机译:聪明的领导者:检查智力与领​​导者发展行为之间的关系

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to examine the relationship between intelligence and behavior during leader development. Design/methodology/approach - As part of a leader development program, a variety of measures are collected, including measures of intelligence and measures of performance (e.g. assessment center performance, a 360-degree appraisal). The participants are given performance feedback from a variety of sources then asked to form developmental goals. The goals are examined for goal quality and goal-feedback correspondence, and examined in relation to intelligence. Findings - Intelligence was positively related to goal-feedback correspondence. Intelligence was also related to goal quality after controlling for variance attributed to professional discipline. Research limitations/implications - Personality, gender, age, and other variables were not included in this study. Other factors, such as the cultures of the organizations from which the individuals hailed, were also not included. Moreover, the conclusions were based on the behaviors exhibited in one leader development program. Future research should address these limitations. Practical implications - Leader development is expensive and is becoming more popular. The results of this research could help organizations better determine who is likely to benefit from the investment in leader development. Originality/value - In addition, a unique method is presented in the study for measuring leader development behavior based on goal quality and goal-feedback correspondence. Generalizability theory is applied in order to determine the reliability of the measures.
机译:目的-本文的目的是研究领导者发展过程中智力与行为之间的关系。设计/方法/方法-作为领导者发展计划的一部分,收集了各种衡量标准,包括智能衡量标准和绩效衡量标准(例如,评估中心的绩效,360度评估)。向参与者提供来自各种来源的绩效反馈,然后要求他们制定发展目标。检查目标的目标质量和目标反馈对应关系,并检查其与智力的关系。调查结果-智力与目标反馈对应关系正相关。在控制了归因于专业纪律的差异之后,智力还与目标质量相关。研究的局限性/含义-人格,性别,年龄和其他变量未包括在本研究中。其他因素,例如个人所赞扬的组织的文化,也未包括在内。此外,结论是基于一个领导者发展计划中表现出来的行为。未来的研究应解决这些局限性。实际意义-领导者培养成本高昂,并且越来越受欢迎。这项研究的结果可以帮助组织更好地确定谁可能从领导者发展的投资中受益。原创性/价值-此外,研究中还提出了一种独特的方法,用于基于目标质量和目标反馈对应关系来衡量领导者发展行为。应用通用性理论以确定措施的可靠性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号