首页> 外文期刊>Law and Philosophy >Historical Entitlement and the Practice of Bequest: Is There a Moral Right of Bequest?
【24h】

Historical Entitlement and the Practice of Bequest: Is There a Moral Right of Bequest?

机译:历史权利和遗产遗产的实践:遗产遗产有道德权利吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Entitlement theorists claim that bequest is a moral right. The aim of this essay is to determine whether entitlement theorists can, on their own grounds, consistently defend that claim. I argue that even if there is a moral right to self-appropriated property and to engage in inter vivos transfers, it is a mistake to contend that there exists an equivalent moral right to make a bequest. Taxing or regulating bequest does not violate an individual’s moral rights because, regardless of whether bequest safeguards certain interests, those interests are not the interests of a living, morally inviolable being. Instead, they are the interests of a deceased entity that has lost the ability to track what it values and pursue projects in accord with those values – a quality that by entitlement theorists’ own arguments renders persons morally significant and deserving of rights in the first place.
机译:权利理论家声称,遗产是一项道德权利。本文的目的是确定授权理论家是否可以根据自己的理由一贯捍卫该主张。我认为,即使有对自有财产和从事人体内转移的精神权利,主张存在同样的精神权利也可以作为遗赠,这是错误的。对遗产进行征税或规管不会侵犯个人的精神权利,因为无论遗产是否维护某些利益,这些利益都不是生活中的,在道德上不可侵犯的人的利益。相反,它们是已故实体的利益,该实体已失去了追踪其价值并按照这些价值进行项目的能力–通过权利理论家自身的论点,这种品质使人在道德上具有重要意义,并首先应享有权利。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Law and Philosophy》 |2010年第6期|p.695-715|共21页
  • 作者

    S. Stewart Braun;

  • 作者单位

    Corcoran Department of Philosophy, University of Virginia, 120 Cocke Hall, P.O. Box 400780, Charlottesville, VA, 22904-4780, USA;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号