首页> 外文期刊>Law Library Journal >Access to the Justices' Papers: A Better Balance
【24h】

Access to the Justices' Papers: A Better Balance

机译:进入法官的论文:更好的平衡

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

But the Constitution does not belong to judges, as a mystery intelligible only to a priestly caste, and it does not belong to political activists, as a set of incendiary talking points. It belongs to the people. It is our responsibility to judge the Court, and it is our judgment that must be decisive in the end.(1)This article explores the history of Supreme Court Justices' papers and their status as private property. It discusses questions of access, the public's interest in understanding the Court and its decisions, and the effect of the Justices' papers on scholarship and popular research. Several options for encouraging greater openness are proposed.
机译:但宪法并不属于法官,作为一个唯一可理解的祭司,它不属于政治活动家,作为一系列煽动性的谈话点。它属于人民。我们有责任判断法庭,这是我们必须在最后决定性的判决。(1)本文探讨了最高法院法官论文的历史及其作为私人财产的地位。它讨论了访问的问题,公众对理解法院的兴趣及其决定,以及法官论文对奖学金和流行研究的影响。提出了一些鼓励更大开放的选项。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Law Library Journal》 |2018年第2期|185-220|共36页
  • 作者

    deMaine Susan David;

  • 作者单位

    Indiana Univ Robert H McKinney Sch Law Ruth Lilly Law Lib Informat Serv Bloomington IN 47405 USA;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号