首页> 外文期刊>Law enforcement technology >Ghost Striping Patrol Vehicles: Good or Bad Idea?
【24h】

Ghost Striping Patrol Vehicles: Good or Bad Idea?

机译:幽灵条纹巡逻车:好还是坏主意?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The driving public has become quite adept at either recognizing law enforcement patrol vehicles or detecting enforcement activities in such an efficient manner that they can selectively obey the law. Drivers who disobey traffic laws aren't anything new. Drivers who plan to break the traffic laws, develop strategies and equip themselves to get away with it—now that's a growing trend. To offset this challenge, law enforcement has had to adapt as well. Two of the largest challenges in this arena are the fact that most law enforcement agencies buy on fleet contracts, so many of the vehicles are the same make and model and the fact that the Commission on Accreditation for Law Enforcement Agencies (CALEA) required front to rear reflective markings as part of the accreditation standard. The second "standard" became so integrated into patrol vehicle design that one media outlet created and published its own requirements as standards for marking a patrol vehicle. Many readers misunderstood and took those published standards to represent some type of requirements for accreditation, legal compliance or other control that mandated such markings.
机译:驾车人士已经非常擅长于识别执法巡逻车或以有效的方式检测执法活动,以便他们可以有选择地遵守法律。违反交通法规的驾驶员并不是什么新鲜事物。计划违反交通法规,制定策略并装备自己以摆脱困境的驾驶员–现在这是一种日益增长的趋势。为了应对这一挑战,执法部门也必须做出适应。在这个领域中,最大的两个挑战是大多数执法机构购买车队合同,许多车辆具有相同的品牌和型号,以及执法机构认可委员会(CALEA)要求首先采取以下行动:背面反光标记是认证标准的一部分。第二个“标准”被如此整合到巡逻车设计中,以至于一个媒体机构创建并发布了自己的要求,作为巡逻车标记的标准。许多读者误解了这些标准,并以出版的标准来代表某种类型的认证,法律合规性要求或要求此类标记的其他控制要求。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号