...
首页> 外文期刊>Landscape journal >Botanic Gardens: Modern-Day Arks
【24h】

Botanic Gardens: Modern-Day Arks

机译:植物园:现代树皮

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Landscape architects have always had a curious relationship with plants and botany. Everybody who has pursued a landscape architecture degree remembers professors' warnings not to create planting designs like a "botanic garden" or "arboretum"—an emphasis on single-specimen plants with sometimes unusual horticultural traits (for example, topiary shaped into animals or big trees bred to have plum-colored leaves) that create one of the major sins of landscape architectural design—a cacophony of visual focal points. For those of us who earned degrees in the mid to late 20th century, large mass plantings of a single, usually non-native, species were one benchmark of successful planting designs. This tradition, which some can argue continues today to some degree, has left landscape architects strangely bereft of botanical knowledge whenever they utter the word "plant material" when they cannot identify a plant to the genus or species levels, which is more often than anyone would like to admit.
机译:景观设计师一直与植物和植物学有着奇怪的关系。追求景观建筑学位的每个人都记得教授的警告,不要创造诸如“植物园”或“树木园”之类的种植设计-强调具有某些不寻常园艺特性(例如,修剪成动物或大型雕塑的修剪植物)的单标本植物培育出的叶子呈李子色的树木)是景观设计的主要罪过之一-视觉焦点的杂音。对于那些在20世纪中后期获得学位的人来说,单个(通常是非本地)物种的大规模种植是成功种植设计的基准之一。某些人可以说这种传统在今天一直延续到一定程度,这种传统使景观设计师在无法识别属植物或物种级别的植物时,只要说出“植物材料”一词,就奇怪地丧失了植物学知识。想承认。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Landscape journal》 |2011年第1期|p.154-156|共3页
  • 作者

    Laura R. Musacchio;

  • 作者单位

    Department of Landscape Architecture at the University of Minnesota;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号