首页> 外文期刊>KSCE journal of civil engineering >Application of model tree and Evolutionary Polynomial Regression for evaluation of sediment transport in pipes
【24h】

Application of model tree and Evolutionary Polynomial Regression for evaluation of sediment transport in pipes

机译:模型树和进化多项式回归在管道输沙评价中的应用

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Prediction of critical velocity for sediment deposition is a significant component in design of sewer pipes. Because of the abrupt changes in velocity and shear stress distributions, traditional equations based on regression analysis can fail in evaluating sediment transport efficiently. Therefore, different artificial intelligence approaches have been applied to investigate sediment transport in sewer pipes. This study proposes two different approaches to predict the critical velocity for sediment deposition in sewer networks: Model Tree (MT) and the Evolutionary Polynomial Regression (EPR), a hybrid data-driven technique that combines genetic algorithms with numerical regression. The hydraulic radius, average size of sediments, volumetric concentration, total friction factor, and non-dimensional sediment size were considered as input parameters to characterize sediment transport in clean sewer pipes. The present study implements data collected from different works in literature. The proposed modeling approaches are compared to some benchmark formulas from literature, and discussed from the accuracy and knowledge discovery points of view, highlighting the advantage of both proposed techniques. Results indicated that both techniques have similar accuracy in predictions, but EPR allows to physical validation of returned formulas, allowing identifying the most influent inputs on the phenomenon at stake.
机译:沉积物临界速度的预测是下水道设计的重要组成部分。由于速度和切应力分布的突然变化,基于回归分析的传统方程式可能无法有效地评估沉积物的运移。因此,已经采用了不同的人工智能方法来研究下水道中的泥沙输送。这项研究提出了两种不同的方法来预测下水道网络中沉积物的临界速度:模型树(MT)和进化多项式回归(EPR),这是一种结合了遗传算法和数值回归的混合数据驱动技术。水力半径,沉积物的平均尺寸,体积浓度,总摩擦系数和无量纲的沉积物尺寸被视为输入参数,以表征清洁下水道中的沉积物传输。本研究实施从不同文献中收集的数据。拟议的建模方法与文献中的一些基准公式进行了比较,并从准确性和知识发现的角度进行了讨论,突出了这两种拟议技术的优势。结果表明,这两种技术在预测中具有相似的准确性,但是EPR可以对返回的公式进行物理验证,从而可以确定最有影响力的现象方面的输入。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号