首页> 外文期刊>The Korean journal of defense analysis >Military Demarcation Line in Korean War Armistice Talks: Pseudo-Negotiations between Strident Antagonists
【24h】

Military Demarcation Line in Korean War Armistice Talks: Pseudo-Negotiations between Strident Antagonists

机译:朝鲜战争停战谈判中的军事分界线:敌对双方之间的伪谈判

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

For the Korean War Armistice Talks, as in any war, the establishment of the military demarcation line was one of the major points of contention between the UN and Communist forces. Furthermore, the lack of a maritime demarcation line was a distinct marker in the case of the Korean War. As most international negotiations do not include detailed information beyond the official transcripts, external indicators and indirect measures must be considered for a more complete analysis. While this inferred approach cannot replace a direct systematic study of the negotiation process, it can still produce some enlightening explanations. In particular, based on negotiation theory, the current research will focus on the causes and processes that led to the rejection of the UN forces' request to shift the land demarcation line further north in return for lifting their naval blockade of the North Korean sea areas, and the settlement of the maritime demarcation line as it is today. Thus, the processes, agenda setting, and conclusions of the negotiations are examined, along with the policy of the United States for ending the Korean War.
机译:在朝鲜战争停战谈判中,如同在任何战争中一样,建立军事分界线是联合国与共产主义军队之间争执的重点之一。此外,在朝鲜战争中,缺乏海上划界线是一个明显的标志。由于大多数国际谈判都没有提供官方成绩单以外的详细信息,因此必须考虑外部指标和间接措施,以便进行更完整的分析。尽管这种推断的方法不能替代对谈判过程的直接系统研究,但仍可以产生一些启发性的解释。特别是,基于谈判理论,当前的研究将集中于导致联合国部队拒绝将陆地分界线向北移动以换取解除对朝鲜海域的海军封锁的要求的原因和过程。 ,以及今天的海上划界线的结算。因此,与美国结束朝鲜战争的政策一起,研究了谈判的过程,议程设置和结论。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号