首页> 外文期刊>JPKE:journal of post keynesian economics >The two methods and the hard core of economics
【24h】

The two methods and the hard core of economics

机译:两种方法和经济学的硬核

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

While methodological sciences have no object and are supposed to adopt a hypothetical-deductive method, substantive sciences, including economics, should use an empirical or historical-deductive method. The great classical economists and Keynes did that and were able to develop open models explaining how equally open economic systems work. Thus, the hard core of relevant economics is formed by the classical microeconomics and the classical theory of capitalist economic growth and by Keynesian macroeconomics. In contrast, neoclassical economists aiming to build a mathematical science wrongly adopted the hypothetical-deductive method and came to macroeconomic and growth models that do not have practical use in policymaking. The exception is Marshall's microeconomics, which does not provide a model of real economic systems but is useful to the analysis of markets.
机译:虽然方法论科学没有目标,应该采用假设推论方法,但包括经济学在内的实体科学应使用经验推论或历史推论方法。伟大的古典经济学家和凯恩斯做到了这一点,并且能够开发出开放的模型来解释开放的经济体系是如何平等运作的。因此,相关经济学的硬核是由古典微观经济学和古典资本主义经济增长理论以及凯恩斯主义宏观经济学形成的。相反,旨在建立数学科学的新古典经济学家错误地采用了假设演绎法,得出了在决策中没有实际应用的宏观经济和增长模型。马歇尔的微观经济学是一个例外,它没有提供真实经济系统的模型,但对市场分析很有用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号