...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of world trade >Patents and Public Health in the WTO, FTAs and Beyond: Tension and Conflict in International Law
【24h】

Patents and Public Health in the WTO, FTAs and Beyond: Tension and Conflict in International Law

机译:WTO,FTA及其后的专利与公共卫生:国际法中的紧张与冲突

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

By mandating patent protection for pharmaceutical products, the Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS Agreement) of the World Trade Organization (WTO) creates difficulties for developing countries seeking to import medicines to deal with serious public health concerns. In 2001, WTO Members began working towards a solution to this problem. Their work led to a temporary waiver of certain TRIPS obligations and a proposal for a formal amendment of the TRIPS Agreement. However, the waiver remains underutilized and the amendment still lacks the necessary support of WTO Members for it to come into effect, suggesting that Members need to re-evaluate their commitment to affordable medicines while testing the workability of the waiver before making it permanent. Moreover, the potential of bilateral approaches to the problem of access to medicines for developing countries in the context of international trade is not being realized. On the contrary, preferential trade agreements concluded with the United States (US), in particular, are extending patent protection and diminishing flexibilities available under the TRIPS Agreement to address public health concerns. A pattern of contradictions exists between the WTO rhetoric on the one hand and Members' domestic frameworks, bilateral agreements, and unilateral actions on the other. When it conies to attaining a coherent approach under international law towards reconciling patents and public health, the outlook is bleak.
机译:通过规定药品的专利保护,世界贸易组织(世贸组织)的《与贸易有关的知识产权协议》(TRIPS协议)给寻求进口药品以解决严重公共卫生问题的发展中国家带来了困难。 2001年,世贸组织成员开始致力于解决这一问题。他们的工作导致暂时放弃了某些TRIPS义务,并提出了对TRIPS协议进行正式修正的提议。但是,这项豁免仍未得到充分利用,该修正案仍未获得世贸组织成员的必要支持,以使其生效,这表明各成员需要在重新制定永久性豁免之前,重新评估其对负担得起的药品的承诺,同时对这项豁免进行可行性测试。此外,在国际贸易的背景下,发展中国家在获取药品方面采取双边办法的潜力尚未得到实现。相反,特别是与美国(US)达成的优惠贸易协定正在扩大TRIPS协定规定的专利保护范围,并减少灵活性,以解决公共卫生问题。一方面世贸组织的言论与会员国的国内框架,双边协议以及另一方面的单方面行动之间存在着某种矛盾。当它想在国际法下采取协调一致的方法来调和专利和公共卫生时,前景就黯淡了。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Journal of world trade》 |2009年第3期|571-601|共31页
  • 作者

    Andrew D. Mitchell; Tania Voon;

  • 作者单位

    Melbourne Law School, University of Melbourne Tim Fischer Centre for Global Trade and Finance, Bond University Supreme Court of Victona and High Court of Australia;

    Melbourne Law School, University of Melbourne Appellate Body Secretariat, World Trade Organization Tim Fischer Centre for Global Trade and Finance, Bond University Supreme Court of Victoria and High Court of Australia;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号