首页> 外文期刊>Journal of world trade >Threat of Injury in Anti-dumping Investigations: Some Comments on the Current Practice at EU and WTO Level
【24h】

Threat of Injury in Anti-dumping Investigations: Some Comments on the Current Practice at EU and WTO Level

机译:反倾销调查中的损害威胁:对欧盟和世贸组织层面现行做法的一些评论

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The imposition of anti-dumping measures under the World Trade Organization (WTO) rules requires three main conditions: the existence of dumping, material injury and the nexus between dumped imports and the damage inflicted to the domestic industry. One of the three possible forms of material injury is threat of injury. The threat of injury claim represents a preventive mechanism that prompts the investigating authorities to act before actual material injury is inflicted on the domestic industry. The major difficulty in assessing a threat of injury claim resides in the prospective nature of the investigating authorities' analysis. Since material injury has not yet occurred at the moment of the analysis, the investigating authorities must determine whether, based on the facts available, material injury is likely to occur in the near future. In order to prevent speculation and abuse, the WTO Anti-dumping Agreement sets forth the elements to be considered for the prospective assessment, such as an analysis based on evidence and facts, a clearly foreseen and imminent change in circumstances, and the economic factors relevant for the determination. Tlie WTO case law adds to these rules, making it clear that the situation of the domestic industry prior to the initiation also plays a role in the prospective analysis. Nevertheless, important matters occurring in practice during anti-dumping investigations at European Union (EU) level remained currently unaddressed. The most significant is the choice of the reference period that stands as a basis for the investigating authority's analysis, cumulation of imports from several countries in threat of injury investigations and calculation of the injury margin. Tliis article aims at addressing these issues based on a recent anti-dumping investigation finalized in September 2009, Seamless Tubes, and scrutinizes whether the European Institutions' approach in this case was in accordance with the WTO standards.
机译:根据世界贸易组织(WTO)规则实施反倾销措施需要三个主要条件:倾销的存在,物质损害以及倾销进口产品与对国内产业造成的损害之间的联系。三种可能的物质伤害形式之一是伤害威胁。伤害威胁索赔是一种预防机制,可促使调查当局在对国内工业造成实质性物质伤害之前采取行动。评估伤害威胁要求的主要困难在于调查机构分析的预期性质。由于在分析之时尚未发生物质伤害,因此调查当局必须根据现有事实确定在不久的将来是否可能发生物质伤害。为了防止投机和滥用,《 WTO反倾销协定》规定了进行前瞻性评估时应考虑的要素,例如基于证据和事实的分析,情况的明显可预见和即将发生的变化以及相关的经济因素。为确定。 WTO判例法对这些规则进行了补充,清楚地表明,启动前的国内产业状况在前瞻性分析中也起作用。尽管如此,目前仍未解决在欧盟(EU)级别的反倾销调查中实际发生的重要事项。最重要的是选择参考期,作为调查机构进行分析,从几个国家进口伤害威胁调查和计算伤害幅度的基础。 Tliis的文章旨在根据2009年9月完成的最近一次反倾销调查Seamless Seamless Tubes来解决这些问题,并仔细研究欧洲机构在此案中的做法是否符合WTO的标准。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号