...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of world business >To elevate or to duplicate? Experiential learning, host-country institutions, and MNE post-entry commitment increase
【24h】

To elevate or to duplicate? Experiential learning, host-country institutions, and MNE post-entry commitment increase

机译:提升还是复制?体验式学习,东道国机构和跨国公司进入后的承诺增加

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

A multinational enterprise's (MNE) decision to commit more resources to a host country operation is a key aspect of internationalization. MNEs can change their foreign operation mode in several ways in order to increase host country commitment after initial entry, but existing theory on mode changes provides little guidance on what drives MNEs to increase commitment in a certain way over another. In this paper, we differentiate between mode duplication, whereby an MNE replicates an existing operation mode in a host country, and mode elevation, whereby an MNE establishes a new, different mode of operation either in lieu of or in addition to an existing one. We subsequently leverage learning theory to argue that both deeper international experience and broader international experience increase the likelihood of implementing a mode elevation rather than a mode duplication due to the higher complexity of the former. We further argue that these relationships are not uniform across different levels of host-country institutional quality. We test our hypotheses in a primary dataset of 80 Austrian MNEs implementing 527 mode changes while internationalizing into 21 countries in Central and Eastern Europe over 24 years, and find support for our theory. Overall, this study contributes to the international business literature on mode changes by offering theory and evidence regarding the drivers of whether an MNE increases foreign commitment by establishing a new operation mode or by duplicating an existing one in a host country.
机译:跨国企业(MNE)决定向东道国运营投入更多资源的决定是国际化的关键方面。跨国公司可以通过几种方式改变其外国经营模式,以便在最初加入后增加东道国的承诺,但是现有的模式改变理论几乎没有指导什么驱动跨国公司以某种方式增加承诺。在本文中,我们区分了模式复制和模式提升,在模式复制中,跨国企业在东道国复制现有的运营模式;在模式提升中,跨国企业建立新的,不同的运营模式,以代替现有模式。随后,我们利用学习理论来论证,由于前者的较高复杂性,更深的国际经验和更广泛的国际经验都增加了实施模式提升而不是模式重复的可能性。我们进一步认为,这些关系在东道国制度质量的不同水平上并不统一。我们在80个实施527种模式转换的奥地利跨国公司的主要数据集中测试了我们的假设,同时在24年中将其国际化为中欧和东欧的21个国家,并为我们的理论提供了支持。总体而言,这项研究通过提供有关跨国公司是通过建立新的运营模式还是通过在东道国复制现有模式来增加外国承诺的驱动因素的理论和证据,为模式改变的国际商业文献做出了贡献。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号