首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Wine Economics >Fairtrade Wine Price Dispersion in the United Kingdom
【24h】

Fairtrade Wine Price Dispersion in the United Kingdom

机译:英国的公平贸易葡萄酒价格分散

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This paper analyzes wine price dispersion in the United Kingdom. In particular, we are interested in examining whether Fairtrade wines are different from non-Fairtrade wines. Because Fairtrade wines serve an additional social purpose, one may think that consumers search less aggressively for the outlet with the lowest price, thus allowing for a larger price dispersion than for regular wines. We draw on data for about seven thousand wines from South Africa, Fairtrade and non-Fairtrade, sold in the United Kingdom between 2007 and 2012. In a first step, we run a hedonic regression model explaining the wine prices using Ordinary Least Squares (OLS) and Two-Stage Least Squares (2SLS) Instrumental Variable (Ⅳ) approaches. In the next step, we regress the squared residuals from the first step on a Fairtrade 0-1 dummy-variable. When using the squared residuals from the OLS model, we find that Fairtrade is a negative determinant of price dispersion. Therefore, Fairtrade wines exhibit a significant lower price dispersion than the comparison group. When using the squared residuals from the Ⅳ model, we find mixed results and suspect the presence of a substantial bias due to weak instruments. Finally, in order to avoid IV pitfalls, we ran Fairtrade and Non-Fairtrade wines in separate equations. We find support for the OLS results, i.e., Fairtrade wines appear to exhibit lower price dispersion than their non-Fairtrade counterparts. Whether this is due to consumer search is a priori unclear.
机译:本文分析了英国的葡萄酒价格差异。特别是,我们有兴趣研究公平贸易葡萄酒与非公平贸易葡萄酒是否不同。由于公平贸易葡萄酒具有另一种社会目的,因此人们可能会认为,消费者对价格最低的门市的搜索较不积极,因此与常规葡萄酒相比,价格差异更大。我们利用2007年至2012年之间在英国售出的大约7,000种来自南非,公平贸易和非公平贸易的葡萄酒的数据。第一步,我们运行享乐回归模型,使用普通最小二乘(OLS)解释葡萄酒价格)和两阶段最小二乘(2SLS)工具变量(Ⅳ)方法。在下一步中,我们对第一步从Fairtrade 0-1虚拟变量上求平方余数进行回归。当使用OLS模型中的平方残差时,我们发现公平贸易是价格分散的否定因素。因此,公平贸易葡萄酒的价格分散性明显低于对照组。当使用来自Ⅳ模型的平方残差时,我们发现混合的结果,并怀疑由于弱仪器而存在明显的偏差。最后,为了避免出现IV陷阱,我们在单独的方程式中运行Fairtrade和Non-Fairtrade葡萄酒。我们发现对OLS结果的支持,即公平贸易葡萄酒的价格差异似乎比非公平贸易的葡萄酒低。先验尚不清楚这是否归因于消费者搜索。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Journal of Wine Economics》 |2017年第4期|446-456|共11页
  • 作者单位

    Institute of Development Research and Development Policy, Ruhr-University Bochum, Universitatsstr.105, 44789 Bochum, Germany;

    Economics Department, New York University, 19 W. 4th St., New York, NY 10012;

    Department of Agricultural Economics, Stellenbosch University, Private Bag X1, Matieland, 7602, South Africa;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Fairtrade; price dispersion; wine;

    机译:公平交易;价格分散;葡萄酒;
  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 23:22:55

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号