...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Wine Economics >Organizational Form and Payoff Imbalances in an Aggrievement Model: Cooperatives versus Privately Owned Wineries
【24h】

Organizational Form and Payoff Imbalances in an Aggrievement Model: Cooperatives versus Privately Owned Wineries

机译:参与模式下的组织形式和收益失衡:合作社与私有酒厂

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

We build on Hart and Holmstrom (2010) to analyze the strategic choice of organizational form among wine producers. They claim that a firm's organizational form, when agreed upon competitively, conditions the sense of entitlement of the involved parties. The sense of entitlement determines their feeling of grievance for the outcome of the contract and, if so, their shading efforts by partially withholding consummate performance, creating deadweight losses. We consider two main organizational forms: non-integration, where growers interact in the winemaking process and can highlight the quality of their individual contributions, and integration, where individual contributions to the process may not be explicitly acknowledged and the winemaker cannot exert quality control over the production chain. We present a formal coordination model that illustrates how cooperatives and private firms can coexist within a market. Furthermore, given the reasonable parameter constraints, it illustrates how an integrated cooperative can obtain a higher social surplus than a non-integrated private firm.
机译:我们基于Hart和Holmstrom(2010)来分析葡萄酒生产商中组织形式的战略选择。他们声称,企业的组织形式在竞争性达成协议后,会影响有关各方的权利意识。权利感决定了他们对合同结果的不满情绪,如果是这样,则决定了他们通过部分扣留完善的履约行为而蒙受的阴影,造成了无谓损失。我们考虑两种主要的组织形式:非整合,即种植者在酿酒过程中相互作用并可以突出其个人贡献的质量;以及整合,其中可能未明确承认对过程的个人贡献,并且酿酒师无法对葡萄酒的质量进行控制。生产链。我们提出了一个正式的协调模型,该模型说明了合作社和私营公司如何在市场中共存。此外,在给定合理的参数约束的情况下,它说明了集成合作社比非集成私人公司如何可以获得更高的社会剩余。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号