...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of water and climate change >A new downscaling approach and its performance with bias correction and spatial disaggregation as contrast
【24h】

A new downscaling approach and its performance with bias correction and spatial disaggregation as contrast

机译:一种新的降尺度方法及其以偏差校正和空间分解为对比的性能

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Bias correction and spatial disaggregation (BCSD) is widely used in coupling general circulation models (GCMs) and hydrological models. However, there are some disadvantages in BCSD, such as only one GCM being selected, correcting biases through quantile-mapping (QM), and downscaling through interpolation. Then a combined approach of canonical correlation analysis filtering, multi-model ensemble, and extreme learning machine (ELM) regressions (CEE) was advanced. The performance of CEE and BCSD was evaluated with Manas River Basin as a study area. Results show it is unreasonable to correct biases through QM as it implies that the climate remains unchanged. Multi-model ensemble provides additional information, which is beneficial for regressions. CEE performs better than BCSD in temperature and precipitation rate downscaling. In CEE, the residual in temperature forecasting can be lower than 0.05 times temperature range and that in precipitation rate can be 0.33 times precipitation rate range. The performance of CEE in temperature downscaling in plains is better than mountainous areas, but for precipitation rate downscaling, it is better in mountainous areas. Increasing rate of temperature in the basin is 0.0254 K/decade, 0.1837 K/decade, and 0.5039 K/decade, and that of precipitation rate is 0.0028 mm/(day x decade), 0.0036 mm/(day x decade), and 0.0022 mm/(day x decade) in RCP2.6, RCP4.5, and RCP8.5, respectively.
机译:偏差校正和空间分解(BCSD)被广泛用于耦合一般环流模型(GCM)和水文模型。但是,BCSD有一些缺点,例如仅选择一个GCM,通过分位数映射(QM)校正偏差以及通过插值缩小比例。然后,提出了一种规范相关分析过滤,多模型集成和极限学习机(ELM)回归(CEE)的组合方法。以马纳斯河流域为研究区域评估了CEE和BCSD的性能。结果表明,通过质量管理纠正偏差是不合理的,因为这暗示着气候保持不变。多模型集成提供了其他信息,这对回归分析很有帮助。在降低温度和降水率方面,CEE的性能优于BCSD。在CEE中,温度预测的残差可以低于温度范围的0.05倍,而降水率的残差可以是降水率范围的0.33倍。 CEE在平原降温方面的表现要好于山区,但对于降水率降尺度而言,在山区好。流域内的温度上升速率分别为0.0254 K /十年,0.1837 K /十年和0.5039 K /十年,而降水速率分别为0.0028 mm /(天x十年),0.0036 mm /(天x十年)和0.0022。 RCP2.6,RCP4.5和RCP8.5中的mm /(天x十进制)。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Journal of water and climate change 》 |2017年第4期| 675-690| 共16页
  • 作者单位

    Shihezi Univ, Coll Water Conservancy & Architectural Engn, Shihezi 832000, Peoples R China;

    Shihezi Univ, Coll Water Conservancy & Architectural Engn, Shihezi 832000, Peoples R China|Tianjin Univ, State Key Lab Hydraul Engn Simulat & Safety, Tianjin 300072, Peoples R China;

    Shihezi Univ, Coll Water Conservancy & Architectural Engn, Shihezi 832000, Peoples R China;

    Shihezi Univ, Coll Water Conservancy & Architectural Engn, Shihezi 832000, Peoples R China;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    BCSD; CEE; downscaling; precipitation rate; QM; temperature;

    机译:BCSD;CEE;降尺度;沉淀率;QM;温度;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号