...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of turbomachinery >Sensitivity Analysis and Numerical Stability Analysis of the Algorithms for Predicting the Performance of Turbines
【24h】

Sensitivity Analysis and Numerical Stability Analysis of the Algorithms for Predicting the Performance of Turbines

机译:涡轮机性能预测算法的灵敏度分析和数值稳定性分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Sensitivity and numerical stability of an algorithm are two of the most important criteria to evaluate its performance. For all published turbine flow models, except Wang method, can be named the "top-down" method (TDM) in which the performance of turbines is calculated from the first stage to the last stage row by row; only Wang method originally proposed by Yonghong Wang can be named the "bottom-up" method (BUM) in which the performance of turbines is calculated from the last stage to the first stage row by row. To find the reason why the stability of the two methods is of great difference, the Wang flow model is researched. The model readily applies to TDM and BUM. How the stability of the two algorithms affected by input error and rounding error is analyzed, the error propagation and distribution in the two methods are obtained. In order to explain the problem more intuitively, the stability of the two methods is described by geometrical ideas. To compare with the known data, the performance of a particular type of turbine is calculated through a series of procedures based on the two algorithms. The results are as follows. The more the calculating point approaches the critical point, the poorer the stability of TDM is. The poor stability can even cause failure in the calculation of TDM. However, BUM has not only good stability but also high accuracy. The result provides an accurate and reliable method (BUM) for estimating the performance of turbines, and it can apply to all one-dimensional performance calculation method for turbine.
机译:算法的敏感性和数值稳定性是评估其性能的两个最重要的标准。对于所有已发布的涡轮机流量模型,除了Wang方法外,都可以称为“自顶向下”方法(TDM),其中从第一阶段到最后阶段逐行计算涡轮机的性能;只有最初由Yonghong Wang提出的Wang方法才能被称为“自下而上”方法(BUM),其中从最后一级到第一级逐行计算涡轮机的性能。为了找出两种方法的稳定性差异很大的原因,研究了Wang流模型。该模型很容易应用于TDM和BUM。如何分析两种算法受输入误差和舍入误差影响的稳定性,得出两种方法中误差的传播和分布。为了更直观地说明问题,用几何思想描述了这两种方法的稳定性。为了与已知数据进行比较,通过基于这两种算法的一系列过程来计算特定类型涡轮机的性能。结果如下。计算点越接近临界点,TDM的稳定性就越差。稳定性差甚至会导致TDM计算失败。但是,BUM不仅具有良好的稳定性,而且具有较高的精度。该结果为涡轮机性能的估算提供了一种准确可靠的方法,可应用于所有一维涡轮机性能计算方法。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Journal of turbomachinery》 |2014年第9期|091006.1-091006.8|共8页
  • 作者单位

    Turbo Machinery Institute, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China;

    Turbo Machinery Institute, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China;

    Turbo Machinery Institute, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号