首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Transportation Engineering >Gap between Policymakers' Priorities and Users' Needs in Planning for Accessible Public Transit System
【24h】

Gap between Policymakers' Priorities and Users' Needs in Planning for Accessible Public Transit System

机译:在规划无障碍公共交通系统时,决策者的优先级与用户需求之间的差距

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Access to public transit forms a vital part of the well-being of people with disabilities. However, people with disabilities continue to be challenged in accessing their local transit services. This study investigates the existence of any gaps in users' needs and practitioners' prioritization of accessibility features. Senior practitioners deemed experts in the field from cities in New Zealand were invited to participate. Data were analyzed using the analytic hierarchy process to determine the ranking of nine accessibility factors. The most important factors identified by practitioners are crossing facilities (0.19) followed by access to stops/stations (0.17), and quality of footpaths (0.13), all of which are parts of the built environment. The least important factors are vegetation (0.047) and information at stops (0.058), whereas users placed more weight on information at stops (0.097) and vegetation (0.089). Bus driver attitude accounted for the largest disparity in prioritization between the two groups with a difference of 0.137. The study highlights the need to shift prioritization closer to the needs of people with disabilities to eliminate barriers.
机译:搭乘公共交通是残疾人福祉的重要组成部分。但是,残疾人在获得当地交通服务方面仍然面临挑战。这项研究调查了用户需求和从业者对可访问性功能的优先排序是否存在任何差距。邀请了被认为是来自新西兰城市的该领域专家的资深从业人员参加。使用层次分析法对数据进行分析,以确定九种可访问性因素的排名。从业人员确定的最重要因素是过境设施(0.19),其次是车站/车站的通行权(0.17)和人行道的质量(0.13),所有这些都是建筑环境的一部分。最不重要的因素是植被(0.047)和停靠站的信息(0.058),而用户则更多地关注停靠站的信息(0.097)和植被(0.089)。公交车司机的态度在两组之间的优先次序分配上存在最大差异,相差0.137。这项研究强调,有必要将优先次序转移到更接近残疾人消除障碍的需求上。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号