首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Transport Geography >Excess commuting: a critical review and comparative analysis of concepts, indices, and policy implications
【24h】

Excess commuting: a critical review and comparative analysis of concepts, indices, and policy implications

机译:通勤过度:对概念,指标和政策含义的严格审查和比较分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The last three decades have witnessed substantial growth in the literature on excess commuting. Researchers have proposed and applied a number of commuting benchmarks and excess commuting indices that aim to evaluate the commuting efficiency and jobs-housing balance of cities. A comprehensive review and comparative evaluation of the proposed metrics in terms of their ability to capture the intended phenomena, while controlling for the other general characteristics of cities, has yet to be performed. This article attempts to fill this gap by examining four commuting benchmarks (minimum commute, maximum commute, random commute, and proportionally matched commute) and five excess commuting indices (excess commute, commuting potential utilized, commuting economy, normalized commuting economy, and effort). Our conceptual analysis of the indices is complemented with a comparative empirical analysis of commuting in thirty Canadian cities. We explore relationships between the indices and point out the strengths and limitations of each. The findings suggest that no single index can adequately capture the commuting performance of an urban area, while each index can be employed to address a specific policy question. Used together, the indices can provide a reasonably good understanding of urban form and commuting behavior. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:在过去的三十年中,有关通勤的文献大量增长。研究人员提出并应用了许多通勤基准和超额通勤指数,旨在评估城市的通勤效率和就业安置平衡。在控制城市其他总体特征的同时,还需要对拟议指标在捕获预期现象的能力方面进行全面的审查和比较评估。本文试图通过研究四个通勤基准(最小通勤,最大通勤,随机通勤和按比例匹配的通勤)和五个超额通勤指数(过量通勤,已利用的通勤潜力,通勤经济性,正常通勤经济性和努力性)来填补这一空白。 。我们对指数的概念分析与加拿大30个城市通勤的比较经验分析相辅相成。我们探索了索引之间的关系,并指出了每个索引的优势和局限性。调查结果表明,没有一个单一的指标可以充分反映出市区的通勤表现,而每个指标都可以用来解决特定的政策问题。这些指数一起使用,可以对城市形态和通勤行为有一个很好的理解。 (C)2015 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号