首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Transport Geography >Implications of automated vehicles for accessibility and location choices: Evidence from an expert-based experiment
【24h】

Implications of automated vehicles for accessibility and location choices: Evidence from an expert-based experiment

机译:自动驾驶汽车对可达性和位置选择的影响:来自专家实验的证据

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In this paper, possible accessibility impacts of fully automated vehicles (AVs) are explored. A conceptual framework for those impacts is developed based on the model of four accessibility components (i.e. land use, transport, temporal and individual) of Geurs and van Wee (2004). Q-method is applied among a sample of seventeen international accessibility experts to explore heterogeneity among experts with respect to the impacts of AVs on accessibility, and study different views and clusters of experts. Q -method statements are deductively categorized according to four accessibility components of the conceptual framework. Three viewpoints were extracted, indicating that experts expect AVs to influence accessibility through all four accessibility components. Viewpoint A expects that accessibility benefits stemming from AVs will be highly uncertain, mainly because of induced travel demand that will likely cancel out travel time and cost savings of AVs in the long term. Viewpoint B anticipates that accessibility changes because of AVs will have two opposing implications for urban form: densification of city center and further urban sprawl. Finally, viewpoint C expects that those who can afford an AV will mainly enjoy AVs benefits, thus AVs will have more negative than positive implications for social equity.
机译:在本文中,探讨了全自动车辆(AV)可能对可访问性产生的影响。基于Geurs和van Wee(2004)的四个辅助功能组件(即土地使用,运输,时间和个人)组成的模型,为这些影响建立了概念框架。在17位国际可访问性专家的样本中应用了Q方法,以探讨AV之间对可访问性的影响方面的专家异质性,并研究专家的不同观点和群体。 Q-方法语句根据概念框架的四个可访问性组件进行了归纳分类。提取了三个观点,表明专家希望AV能够通过所有四个可访问性组件来影响可访问性。观点A预计,自动驾驶汽车带来的可及性优势将非常不确定,这主要是由于诱发的旅行需求,从长远来看可能会抵消旅行时间并节省自动驾驶汽车的成本。观点B预期,由于AV导致的可访问性变化将对城市形态产生两个相反的影响:城市中心的致密化和进一步的城市扩张。最后,观点C预期,有能力负担房贷的人将主要享受房贷的利益,因此房贷对社会公平的负面影响要大于正面影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号