首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Transport Geography >How does ridesourcing substitute for public transit? A geospatial perspective in Chengdu, China
【24h】

How does ridesourcing substitute for public transit? A geospatial perspective in Chengdu, China

机译:如何互动替代公共交通工具?中国成都的地理空间视角

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The explosive growth of ridesourcing services has stimulated a debate on whether they represent a net substitute for or a complement to public transit. Among the empirical evidence that supports discussion of the net effect at the city level, analysis at the disaggregated level from a geospatial perspective is lacking. Besides, it remains unexplored the spatiotemporal pattern of ridesourcing's effect on public transit, and the factors that impact the effect. Using DiDi Chuxing data in Chengdu, China, this paper develops a three-level structure to recognize the potential substitution or complementary effects of ridesourcing on public transit. Furthermore, this paper investigates the effects through exploratory spatiotemporal data analysis, and examines the factors influencing the degree of substitution via linear, spatial autoregressive, and zero-inflated beta regression models. The results show that 33.1% of DiDi trips have the potential to substitute for public transit. The substitution rate is higher during the day (8:00-18:00), and the trend follows changes in public transit coverage. The substitution effect is more exhibited in the city center and the areas covered by the subway, while the complementary effect is more exhibited in suburban areas as public transit has poor coverage. Further examination of the factors impacting the relationship indicates that housing price is positively associated with the substitution rate, and distance to the nearest subway station has a negative association with it, while the effects of most built environment factors become insignificant in zero-inflated beta regression. Based on these findings, policy implications are drawn regarding the partnership between transit agencies and ridesourcing companies, the spatial-differentiated policies in the central and suburban areas, and the potential problems in providing ridesourcing service to the economically disadvantaged population.
机译:救济服务的爆炸性增长刺激了关于它们是否代表公共交通的净替代品或补充的辩论。在支持城市一级净效应讨论的经验证据中,缺乏从地理空间视角的分列水平分析。此外,它仍然未探讨了对公共交通影响的时空模式,以及影响效果的因素。在中国成都的DIDI Chuxing数据,本文开发了三级结构,以认识到郊游郊区的潜在替代或互补影响。此外,本文通过探索性时空数据分析调查了影响,并通过线性,空间自回归和零充气的β回归模型来检查影响替代程度的因素。结果表明,33.1%的DIDI旅行有可能替代公共交通工具。白天的替代率较高(8:00-18:00),趋势遵循公共交通覆盖的变化。在市中心和地铁所涵盖的地区更具替代效果,而郊区地区的互补效果在郊区覆盖率差。进一步检查影响关系的因素表明,房价与替代率正相关,与最近地铁站的距离与其有负关联,而大多数建筑环境因素的效果在零充气的β回归中变得微不足道。 。基于这些调查结果,筹集了政策影响,就过境机构和郊游公司之间的伙伴关系,中央和郊区的空间区别差异化,以及向经济弱势群体提供郊游服务的潜在问题。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号