...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health, Part A: Current Issues >Microbiopsies of Surface Dental Enamel as a Tool to Measure Body Lead Burden
【24h】

Microbiopsies of Surface Dental Enamel as a Tool to Measure Body Lead Burden

机译:表面牙釉质的活检作为测量身体铅负担的工具

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Lead (Pb) poisoning is preventable but continues to be a public health problem in several countries. Measuring Pb in the surface dental enamel (SDE) using microbiopsies is a rapid, safe, and painless procedure. There are different protocols to perform these microbiopsies, but the reliability of dental enamel lead levels (DELL) determination is dependent upon biopsy depth (BD). It is established that DELL decrease from the outermost superficial layer to the inner layer of dental enamel. The aim of this study was to determine DELL obtained by two different microbiopsy techniques on SDE termed protocol I and protocol II. Two consecutive enamel layers were removed from the same subject group (n = 138) for both protocols. Protocol I consisted of a biopsied site with a diameter of 4 mm after the application of 10 μl HCl for 35 s. Protocol II involved a biopsied site of 1.6 mm diameter after application of 5 μl HCl for 20 s. The results demonstrated that there were no significant differences for BD and DELL between homologous teeth using protocol I. However, there was a significant difference between DELL in the first and second layers using both protocols. Further, the BD in protocol II overestimated DELL values. In conclusion, SDE analyzed by microbiopsy is a reliable biomarker in protocol I, but the chemical method to calculate BD in protocol II appeared to be inadequate for measurement of DELL. Thus, DELL could not be compared among studies that used different methodologies for SDE microbiopsies.
机译:铅(Pb)中毒是可以预防的,但在一些国家中仍然是公共卫生问题。使用活组织检查法测量表面牙釉质(SDE)中的Pb是一种快速,安全且无痛的过程。有多种执行这些活检的协议,但是牙釉质铅水平(DELL)确定的可靠性取决于活检深度(BD)。已经确定DELL从牙釉质的最外表层到内层减少。这项研究的目的是确定通过两种不同的活检技术在SDE上获得的DELL,分别称为方案I和方案II。对于两种方案,从同一受试者组(n = 138)中去除了两个连续的牙釉质层。协议我包括一个直径为4毫米的活检部位,应用10 µl HCl持续35 s。协议二涉及应用5μlHCl 20 s后,直径1.6毫米的活检部位。结果表明,使用方案I,同源牙齿之间的BD和DELL没有显着差异。但是,使用两种方案,第一层和第二层中的DELL之间都没有显着差异。此外,协议II中的BD高估了DELL值。总之,通过活检分析的SDE是方案I中可靠的生物标志物,但方案II中计算BD的化学方法似乎不足以测量DELL。因此,DELL无法在使用不同方法进行SDE活检的研究之间进行比较。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号