首页> 外文期刊>Journal for the History of Astronomy >A Comparison of Chinese and Indian Solar Theories in the Sui and Early Tang Periods (Seventh-Eighth Centuries c.e.)
【24h】

A Comparison of Chinese and Indian Solar Theories in the Sui and Early Tang Periods (Seventh-Eighth Centuries c.e.)

机译:隋唐初的中印太阳能理论比较(公元七八世纪)

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The Sovereign Pole System (Huang ji li &&&, a.d. 600) is the first Chinese astronomical system to include a solar equation table for calculating the motion of the Sun. From then on, each Chinese system took the solar equation of centre into consideration. Some scholars have argued that Chinese solar theory in the Sui and Tang dynasties was developed independently by Chinese astronomers. However, other scholars have speculated that this theory was ultimately influenced by Babylonian astronomy, through the medium of Indian astronomy. In this paper, we compare Chinese solar theory in the Sui and early Tang periods with Indian solar theory in the sixth century. First, we discuss the content, meaning, and accuracy of the solar equation tables in the Sovereign Pole System, the Great Patrimony System (Da ye li (sic)&&, a.d. 607), and the Great Expansion System (Dan yan li (sic)&&, a.d. 727), three representative Chinese systems of the Sui and early Tang periods. Then, we discuss the speed of the Sun, the accuracy of the solar equation of centre, and the difference between the motions of the true Sun and mean Sun in the Vasistha Siddhanta, Paulisa Siddhanta, and Romaka Siddhanta, three Indian astronomical works collected in the Pancasiddhantika in the sixth century. Finally, we discuss the similarities and differences between Indian and Chinese solar theories in the Sui and early Tang periods. The results show that while Chinese solar theory in the Sui and early Tang periods was very similar to Indian solar theory in the sixth century, Indian astronomers had a more sophisticated view of solar theory than their Chinese contemporaries, both in relation to the difference between the mean Sun and true Sun and in the selection of the longitude of perigee of the Sun. At the same time, we must note that the influence of Indian solar theory on Chinese solar theory was very limited, even if Chinese solar theory in the Sui and Tang dynasties was possibly influenced by Indian solar theory.
机译:主权极系统(Huang ji li &&&,公元600年)是中国第一个包括用于计算太阳运动的太阳方程表的天文系统。从那时起,每个中国系统都考虑了中心太阳方程。一些学者认为,隋唐时期的中国太阳理论是中国天文学家独立发展的。但是,其他学者推测,该理论最终通过印度天文学受到了巴比伦天文学的影响。本文将隋唐初的中国太阳理论与六世纪的印度太阳理论进行了比较。首先,我们讨论了极点系统,大宗法系(da ye li(sic)&&,ad 607)和大膨胀系(Dan yan li(sic)中太阳方程表的内容,含义和准确性。 )&&,广告727),隋代和唐初的三个具有代表性的中文系统。然后,我们讨论太阳的速度,中心太阳方程的精度,以及Vasistha Siddhanta,Paulisa Siddhanta和Romaka Siddhanta中真实太阳与均值太阳运动之间的差异,这三个印度天文学作品收集于六世纪的Pancasiddhantika。最后,我们讨论了隋朝和唐初印度和中国的太阳理论之间的异同。结果表明,尽管隋朝和唐初中国的太阳理论与六世纪的印度太阳理论非常相似,但印度天文学家对太阳理论的理解要比其中国当代人更为复杂,两者都与太阳系之间的差异有关。指太阳和真太阳,以及太阳近地点的经度。同时,我们必须指出,即使隋唐时期的中国太阳理论可能受到印度太阳理论的影响,印度太阳理论对中国太阳理论的影响还是非常有限的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号