首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Taxation of Investments >Are Recoveries for Losses Taxable? The Commissioner's Nonacquiescence in Cosentino Muddies the Waters
【24h】

Are Recoveries for Losses Taxable? The Commissioner's Nonacquiescence in Cosentino Muddies the Waters

机译:追回损失应征税吗?专员对科森蒂诺的默许使水域陷入泥泞

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The tax treatment of the recovery of losses is a common issue, as is the question of what constitutes a loss. The governing principles, not always clear to begin with, have been further muddied by the Commissioner's nonacquiescence in the 2014 Tax Court decision in Cosentino v. Commissioner, a case involving an accounting firm's compensation of the Cosentinos for, among other things, additional federal income tax they had paid because of the firm's suspect advice. The Internal Revenue Service distinguishes Cosentino from the classic Board of Tax Appeals case Clark v. Commissioner, on which the Tax Court had relied in holding that the recovery of federal income tax paid wasn't taxable. This article discusses the tax treatment of losses and loss recoveries generally and examines both Clark and Cosentino in detail. The conclusion: The distinctions that the Service sees between those two cases are plausible in some respects, but not satisfying.
机译:追回损失的税收处理是一个普遍问题,构成损失的问题也是一个普遍问题。专员在2014年Cosentino诉Commissioner案中的税务法庭裁决中没有默许该主管原则,尽管起初并不总是很明确,该案涉及一家会计师事务所就Cosentinos除其他外的联邦收入的赔偿他们由于该公司的可疑建议而支付的税款。美国国税局(Internal Revenue Service)将Cosentino与经典的“税务上诉委员会”案Clark v。Commissioner区别开来,税务法院依据该案裁定,联邦已缴纳的联邦所得税无需缴税。本文讨论了损失和损失追回的税收处理方法,并详细研究了Clark和Cosentino。结论:军方在这两种情况之间看到的区别在某些方面是合理的,但并不令人满意。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Journal of Taxation of Investments》 |2017年第2期|47-62|共16页
  • 作者

    Erik M. Jensen;

  • 作者单位

    Case Western Reserve University School of Law;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 23:45:36

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号