首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Taxation of Investments >Section 280E and the Cannabis Industry
【24h】

Section 280E and the Cannabis Industry

机译:第280E节和大麻产业

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Section 280E of the Internal Revenue Code was upheld by the United States Tax Court, in Northern California Small Business Assistants Inc. v. Commissioner. Section 280E denies all trade or business deductions and credits for trafficking in controlled substances. Despite legalization in several states, under federal law marijuana remains a Schedule I controlled substance. The United States Tax Court held that Section 280E is not a penalty provision and thus does not violate the Eighth Amendment, that the restriction of Section 280E is not limited only to the business expenses deductible under Section 162, and that Section 280E is not limited to only illegal marijuana activities despite the use of the word "trafficking" in Section 280E. In a blow to the American cannabis industry, the United States Tax Court, in Northern California Small Business Assistants Inc. v. Commissioner,1 held in October 2019 that Section 280E of the Internal Revenue Code did not violate the Eighth Amendment to the United States Constitution.
机译:美国税务法院驻加州北部小型商业助理公司V.委员,美国税法280E被维持。委员。专员。第280E节否认所有贸易或商业扣除和学分贩运受控物质。尽管在若干国家合法化,但在联邦法律下,大麻仍然是一个安排我控制的物质。美国税法召开认为,第280E条不是罚款条款,因此不会违反第八次修正案,即第280E条的限制仅限于第162条禁借的业务费用,而该第280E条不仅限于尽管在280E条中使用“贩运”这个词,才唯一是非法大麻的活动。在对美国大麻行业的打击中,美国税务法院,在加州北部的小型商业助理公司诉讼,2019年10月1日举行的第1届,内部收入守则第280E条没有违反向美国的第八修正案宪法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号