...
首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of Systems and Software >Software test process improvement approaches: A systematic literature review and an industrial case study
【24h】

Software test process improvement approaches: A systematic literature review and an industrial case study

机译:软件测试过程改进方法:系统的文献综述和工业案例研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Software test process improvement (STPI) approaches are frameworks that guide software development organizations to improve their software testing process. We have identified existing STPI approaches and their characteristics (such as completeness of development, availability of information and assessment instruments, and domain limitations of the approaches) using a systematic literature review (SLR). Furthermore, two selected approaches (TP1 NEXT and TMMi) are evaluated with respect to their content and assessment results in industry. As a result of this study, we have identified 18 STPI approaches and their characteristics. A detailed comparison of the content of TPI NEXT and TMMi is done. We found that many of the STPI approaches do not provide sufficient information or the approaches do not include assessment instruments. This makes it difficult to apply many approaches in industry. Greater similarities were found between TPI NEXT and TMMi and fewer differences. We conclude that numerous STPI approaches are available but not all are generally applicable for industry. One major difference between available approaches is their model representation. Even though the applied approaches generally show strong similarities, differences in the assessment results arise due to their different model representations.
机译:软件测试过程改进(STPI)方法是指导软件开发组织改进其软件测试过程的框架。我们已经使用系统的文献综述(SLR)确定了现有的STPI方法及其特征(例如开发的完整性,信息和评估工具的可用性以及方法的领域限制)。此外,针对两种选择的方法(TP1 NEXT和TMMi)对其内容和行业评估结果进行了评估。这项研究的结果是,我们确定了18种STPI方法及其特征。对TPI NEXT和TMMi的内容进行了详细的比较。我们发现许多STPI方法不能提供足够的信息,或者这些方法不包括评估工具。这使得很难在工业中应用许多方法。在TPI NEXT和TMMi之间发现了更大的相似性,而更少的差异。我们得出结论,有许多STPI方法可用,但并非所有方法都普遍适用于工业。可用方法之间的主要区别之一是它们的模型表示。尽管所采用的方法通常具有很强的相似性,但由于其模型表示形式不同,因此评估结果也会出现差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号