首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Sustainable Tourism >Tourism revenue sharing policy at Bwindi Impenetrable National Park, Uganda: a policy arrangements approach
【24h】

Tourism revenue sharing policy at Bwindi Impenetrable National Park, Uganda: a policy arrangements approach

机译:乌干达布恩迪难以穿越的国家公园旅游收入分享政策:政策安排方法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Debates on how to deliver conservation benefits to communities living close to protected high-biodiversity areas have preoccupied conservationists for over 20 years. Tourism revenue sharing (TRS) has become a widespread policy intervention in Africa and elsewhere where charismatic populations of wildlife remain. This paper analyzes TRS policy at Bwindi Impenetrable National Park (BINP), Uganda, from a policy arrangements perspective. It is based on data collected at BINP and three surrounding parishes, using qualitative methods. It concludes that the governance capacity of the TRS policy arrangement at BINP is low due to the structural incongruence of the dimensions of the policy arrangement (analyzed in terms of actors, resources, rules of the game and discourses). Despite the participatory rhetoric of policy reforms, the Uganda Wildlife Authority remains the most powerful actor: it has control over resources and consequently determines the rules of the game. Local communities do not feel adequately compensated for conservation costs. This issue is exacerbated by weak communications with local people, problems of fair distribution locally and nationally, corruption claims and powerful local elites. To maximize TRS' ability to contribute to conservation through development, inequities in the design of the TRS and dispersion of benefits need to be addressed.
机译:关于如何向居住在受保护的高生物多样性地区附近的社区提供保护利益的争论已经使保护主义者沉迷了二十多年。旅游收入分成(TRS)已成为在非洲和其他野生动植物种群数量众多的地方广泛的政策干预措施。本文从政策安排的角度分析了乌干达布恩迪难以穿越的国家公园(BINP)的TRS政策。它基于BINP和周围三个教区的定性方法收集的数据。结论是,BINP的TRS政策安排的治理能力很低,这是由于政策安排的维度在结构上不一致(从参与者,资源,游戏规则和话语方面进行了分析)。尽管采取了政策性改革的参与性言论,但乌干达野生动物管理局仍然是最有力的行动者:它拥有对资源的控制权,因此决定了游戏规则。当地社区对保护成本没有得到足够的补偿。与当地人的沟通薄弱,在本地和全国范围内的公平分配问题,腐败索取权和强大的地方精英问题使这一问题更加恶化。为了最大化TRS通过发展为保护做出贡献的能力,需要解决TRS设计中的不公平性和利益分散问题。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号