首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Sustainable Tourism >Khanyayo village and Mkhambathi Nature Reserve, South Africa: a pragmatic qualitative investigation into attitudes towards a protected area
【24h】

Khanyayo village and Mkhambathi Nature Reserve, South Africa: a pragmatic qualitative investigation into attitudes towards a protected area

机译:南非Khanyayo村和Mkhambathi自然保护区:对保护区态度的务实定性调查

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Protected areas are often surrounded by impoverished communities. Biodiversity must be conserved while enabling community members' livelihoods. Benefit-sharing has been promoted as a means of fostering positive relationships between protected areas and local people, but views differ regarding which benefits have positive results; and which are most valued by communities themselves. This research investigates the attitudes of Khanyayo village towards Mkhambathi Nature Reserve on the Wild Coast of South Africa. A pragmatic, multi-method comparative qualitative approach was followed. Participants were local community members and key staff at Mkhambathi, who work with the community. Individual interviews, focus group interviews and an adapted nominal grouping technique were used, which aided triangulation. Results indicated a range of significant benefits and losses. Tangibles included access to natural resources, employment, infrastructure and training. More intangibles emerged though, such as enjoyment of reserve, involvement in the reserve, communication and environmental education. Losses predominantly related to prohibited or restricted access to natural resources. The comparison between the two participant groups yielded interesting insights. Knowing which benefits are most important to the community and aligning the perceptions of the people and the park staff could improve the relationship as well as enhance successful benefit-sharing.
机译:保护区经常被贫困社区包围。在维护社区成员的生计的同时,必须保护生物多样性。利益共享已得到促进,以促进保护区与当地人民之间的积极关系,但对于哪些利益产生积极成果存在不同看法。而社区本身最看重这些东西。这项研究调查了Khanyayo村对南非野生海岸Mkhambathi自然保护区的态度。遵循务实的,多方法的比较定性方法。参与者是Mkhambathi的当地社区成员和关键人员,他们与社区一起工作。使用了个人访谈,焦点小组访谈和经过调整的名义分组技术,这有助于三角剖分。结果表明了一系列重大利弊。有形物品包括获得自然资源,就业,基础设施和培训的机会。但是,出现了更多的无形资产,例如享受储备金,参与储备金,沟通和环境教育。损失主要与禁止或限制获取自然资源有关。两组参与者之间的比较产生了有趣的见解。知道哪些利益对社区最重要,并使人们与公园工作人员的看法保持一致,可以改善关系并促进成功的利益分享。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号