...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of structural engineering >Counteracting Structural Loads: Treatment In Asce Standard 7-05
【24h】

Counteracting Structural Loads: Treatment In Asce Standard 7-05

机译:抵消结构载荷:Ace Standard 7-05中的处理

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The load combinations in ASCE Standard 7 for load and resistance factor design (LRFD) and for allowable stress design (ASD) differ in their treatment of counteracting loads, where the permanent gravity load (dead load) stabilizes the structural system against the effect of uplift or lateral loads. In LRFD, the loads are factored prior to the analysis, and the load factor on dead load is less than unity. In ASD, one factor of safety (the allowable stress factor) had been applied to the difference between the nominal load effects through the 1995 edition of ASCE Standard 7. Beginning with the 1998 edition, the load factor on nominal dead load in the ASD combination was increased to 0.6 to achieve consistency between ASD and LRFD. This particular ASD load requirement has been controversial and has drawn criticism from certain segments of the structural engineering community. This technical note examines the treatment of counteracting loads in ASCE Standard 7 from a reliability viewpoint, and shows that failure to reduce the gravity load for design may lead to inadequate safety.
机译:ASCE标准7中针对荷载和阻力系数设计(LRFD)和容许应力设计(ASD)的荷载组合在抵抗荷载的处理方式上有所不同,其中永久重力荷载(静载荷)使结构系统稳定,免受隆起的影响或横向载荷。在LRFD中,在分析之前先对载荷进行分解,并且静载荷下的载荷系数小于1。在ASD中,通过1995版的ASCE标准7对名义载荷效应之间的差异应用了一个安全系数(容许应力因子)。从1998年版开始,ASD组合中的额定静载荷的载荷系数增加到0.6以实现ASD和LRFD之间的一致性。这种特殊的ASD载荷要求一直存在争议,并引起了结构工程界某些方面的批评。该技术说明从可靠性的角度研究了ASCE Standard 7中抵消负载的处理方式,并表明未能降低设计的重力负载可能会导致安全性不足。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号