首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research >A 4-WEEK CHOICE FOOT SPEED AND CHOICE REACTION TRAINING PROGRAM IMPROVES AGILITY IN PREVIOUSLY NON-AGILITY TRAINED, BUT ACTIVE MEN AND WOMEN
【24h】

A 4-WEEK CHOICE FOOT SPEED AND CHOICE REACTION TRAINING PROGRAM IMPROVES AGILITY IN PREVIOUSLY NON-AGILITY TRAINED, BUT ACTIVE MEN AND WOMEN

机译:4周选择脚速度和选择反应训练计划可以提高先前没有敏捷训练但活跃的男女的敏捷性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Computerized agility training (CAT) products are frequently suggested to improve agility. However, these claims often are made without unbiased scientific support. Therefore, the purpose of this study was (a) to determine the reliability and effectiveness of a 4-week CAT training program on foot speed (FS) and choice reaction (REACT), and (b) to assess whether training on the CAT would facilitate the improvement of a separate change-of-direction (COD) test in non-agility-trained, but active, men and women. Twenty-three participants (15 men, 8 women) pre- and posttested on FS, REACT, and COD drills. Eleven of those participants (7 men, 4 women) engaged in 4 weeks of training on the FS and REACT drills (EX). The remaining 12 (8 men, 4 women) did not participate in the training and served as controls (CON). Coefficients of variation indicate strong precision for FS (6.9%) and REACT (2.6%). Test-retest reliability, as analyzed by intraclass correlations (ICC), were high for both FS and REACT (0.89). Significant test-by-group interactions were observed for all three tests: FS (p = 0.004), REACT (p = 0.011), and COD (p = 0.049). Post hoc analysis indicated that EX increased foot contacts for the FS drill (p = 0.006), whereas REACT and COD demonstrated decreases in time to completion (p = 0.013 and 0.038, respectively). The CON group did not improve on any of the tests. This study indicates that the chosen CAT is an accurate and reliable tool for measuring foot speed and reaction time. These data justify the use of this CAT in analyzing foot speed and reaction time. Altogether, 4 weeks of foot speed and reaction training on the chosen CAT produced improvements in overall agility in nonagility-trained, but active, men and women. These data warrant the integration of such a device into the training program of untrained athletes attempting to improve agility. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]
机译:经常建议使用计算机敏捷训练(CAT)产品来提高敏捷性。但是,这些主张通常是在没有公正的科学支持的情况下提出的。因此,本研究的目的是(a)确定有关脚速(FS)和选择反应(REACT)的4周CAT培训计划的可靠性和有效性,以及(b)评估是否对CAT进行培训会有助于改进未经敏捷训练但活跃的男性和女性的单独方向改变(COD)测试。 23名参与者(15名男性,8名女性)在FS,REACT和COD演习中进行了预测试和后测试。其中11名参与者(7名男性,4名女性)参加了FS和REACT演习(EX)的4周培训。其余的12名(男8名,女4名)未参加培训,而是作为对照(CON)。变异系数表明FS(6.9%)和REACT(2.6%)的精确度很高。通过组内相关性(ICC)分析,对于FS和REACT而言,重测信度均很高(0.89)。在所有三个测试中均观察到了显着的逐组交互作用:FS(p = 0.004),REACT(p = 0.011)和COD(p = 0.049)。事后分析表明,FS钻头的EX接触增加了脚的接触(p = 0.006),而REACT和COD则显示出完成时间的减少(分别为p = 0.013和0.038)。 CON组在任何测试中均无改善。这项研究表明,所选的CAT是测量脚步速度和反应时间的准确可靠的工具。这些数据证明了使用该CAT分析脚速和反应时间的合理性。总的来说,在经过选择的CAT上进行4周的脚步速度和反应训练后,无论是非敏捷训练,还是活跃的男性和女性,其整体敏捷性都得到了改善。这些数据确保将这种设备集成到试图提高敏捷性的未经训练的运动员的训练计划中。 [出版物摘要]

著录项

  • 来源
    《Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research》 |2008年第6期|p.1901-1907|共7页
  • 作者单位

    ANDREW J. GALPIN, YUHUA LI, COKEY A. LOHNES, AND BRIAN K. SCHILLINGDepartment of Health and Sport Sciences, Human Performance Laboratories, The University of Memphis, Memphis, TennesseeAddress correspondence to Andrew J. Galpin, ajgalpin@bsu.edu.22(6)1901-1907Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research© 2008 National Strength and Conditioning Association;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号