...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness >Physiological differences in professional basketball players as a function of playing position and level of play
【24h】

Physiological differences in professional basketball players as a function of playing position and level of play

机译:职业篮球运动员的生理差异与比赛位置和比赛水平的关系

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Aim. The aim of this investigation is to evaluate the physical and physiological characteristics of different first (ProA) and second division (ProB) professional basketball players, and to relate them to playing position and level of play. Methods. A total of 58 players were divided into ProA and ProB groups and were assessed for physical characteristics, maximal treadmill test and a 30 s all-out test. The sample included 22 centers, 22 forwards and 14 guards. Results. Centers were significantly taller and heavier (203.9±5.3 cm and 103.9±12.4 kg) than forwards (195.8±4.8 cm and 89.4±7.1 kg) and guards (185.7±6.9 and 82±8.8 kg) and also had higher body fat percentages than the other groups. Forwards were also significantly taller than guards. Centers presented a lower maximal aerobic velocity (km·h~(-1)) than guards (15.5±1.2 vs 16.8±1.5, P < 0.05) on the maximal treadmill test and a lower maximal velocity (rpm) than forwards (156.5±18.4 vs 170.3±18.3, P < 0.05) on the 30 s all-out test. VO_(2max) (ml·min~(-1) · kg~(-1)) was significantly lower for ProA (53.7±6.7) compared to ProB (56.5±7.7) players and the fatigue index on the 30 s all-out test was higher for the ProA group (P < 0.05). Conclusion. Many physical differences, most notably size, exist between players as a function of their playing position. But these differences have no relationship to the level of play of professional players. General aerobic capacity is fairly homogeneous between playing position and level of play, even if there are observable VO_(2max) differences due to inter-individual profiles. On the other hand, anaerobic capacity seems to be a better predictor of playing level even though it is not clear whether such capacity comes from specific training in ProA, or from an initial selection criteria.
机译:目标。这项调查的目的是评估不同的第一(ProA)和第二(ProB)职业篮球运动员的身体和生理特征,并将他们与比赛位置和比赛水平联系起来。方法。共有58名运动员被分为ProA组和ProB组,并对其身体特征,最大跑步机测试和30 s全力测试进行了评估。样本包括22个中锋,22个前锋和14个后卫。结果。中心比前锋(195.8±4.8 cm和89.4±7.1 kg)和后卫(185.7±6.9和82±8.8 kg)高得多,体重更高(203.9±5.3 cm和103.9±12.4 kg),身体脂肪百分比也高于其他组。前锋也比后卫高得多。中心在最大跑步机测试中的最大有氧运动速度(km·h〜(-1))比后卫(15.5±1.2对16.8±1.5,P <0.05)低,而最大运动速度(rpm)比前卫(156.5±)低。 30 s全力测试时为18.4 vs 170.3±18.3,P <0.05)。与ProB(56.5±7.7)播放器相比,ProA(53.7±6.7)的VO_(2max)(ml·min〜(-1)·kg〜(-1))显着降低,疲劳指数在30 s内ProA组的out检验较高(P <0.05)。结论。球员之间存在许多身体差异,尤其是身材差异,这取决于他们的比赛位置。但是这些差异与职业球员的比赛水平没有关系。即使由于个体之间的差异而存在明显的VO_(2max)差异,一般有氧运动能力在比赛位置和比赛水平之间也相当均匀。另一方面,无氧能力似乎可以更好地预测比赛水平,尽管尚不清楚这种能力是来自于ProA的特定训练还是来自最初的选择标准。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号