首页> 外文期刊>The journal of sports medicine and physical fitness >Acute Physiological Responses To Different Circuit Training Protocols
【24h】

Acute Physiological Responses To Different Circuit Training Protocols

机译:对不同电路训练方案的急性生理反应

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Aim. The purpose of present study was to compare the acute physiological responses to a circuit weight training with the responses to a combined circuit training (weight training and treadmill run).rnMethods. The sample consisted of 25 individuals at an average state of training, 10 men and 15 female, between 18 and 35 year old. There were selected 60 second sets of resistance exercises to the circuit weight training (CWT). Whereas in the combined circuit training (CCT), the subjects spent 30 seconds on the same resistance exercises and 30 seconds running on the treadmill. The rest intervals between the sets lasted 15 seconds. The analysis of variance (ANOVA) with 5% significance level was utilized to the statistical analysis of the results. Results. Comparing circuit training protocols, it was noted that CCT elicits a higher relative and absolute VO_2 and energy expenditure values than CWT for both genders (P<0.05). Regarding inter-gender comparison, males showed higher absolute and relative VO_2 and absolute energy expenditure values for both CWT and CCT than females (P<0.05). Females showed a significant greater % VO_(2max) value for both CWT and CCT. Due to the experimental conditions used to state both circuit training bouts (CWT and CCT), the VO_2 rate found was higher than the values reported by previous studies which used heavier weight lift. Conclusion. CCT seems adequate to produce cardiovascular improvements and greater energy expenditure for both men and women, while CWT group classes are sufficient only for unfit women.
机译:目标。本研究的目的是将对循环重量训练的急性生理反应与对组合循环训练(重量训练和跑步机跑步)的反应进行比较。样本由25名平均受过训练的人组成,其中10名男性和15名女性,年龄在18至35岁之间。选择了60套第二套对电路重量训练(CWT)的抵抗运动。而在联合循环训练(CCT)中,受试者在相同的阻力锻炼上花费30秒,在跑步机上花费30秒。两组之间的休息间隔持续15秒。显着性水平为5%的方差分析(ANOVA)用于结果的统计分析。结果。比较电路训练方案,注意到CCT引起的相对和绝对VO_2和能量消耗值均高于CWT(P <0.05)。关于性别间的比较,男性的CWT和CCT的绝对和相对VO_2和绝对能量消耗值均高于女性(P <0.05)。女性的CWT和CCT的VO_(2max)百分比均显着较高。由于用于陈述两个电路训练回合(CWT和CCT)的实验条件,发现的VO_2速率高于以前使用较重举重的研究报告的值。结论。 CCT似乎足以使男性和女性改善心血管疾病并增加能量消耗,而CWT小组课程仅对不健康的女性就足够了。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号