首页> 外文期刊>Journal of soil & sediments >Investigation on soil contamination at recently inundated and non-inundated sites
【24h】

Investigation on soil contamination at recently inundated and non-inundated sites

机译:最近被淹没和未被淹没地点的土壤污染调查

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose This study was carried out to determine hazards of particle-bound contaminants in rivers to retention areas close to public well fields in the context of flood events. The focus was on the assessment of soil contamination at a planned retention area. Soil core samples were chemically and biologically analyzed. Samples were fractionated to identify and compare contaminant loads and biological effects of soil and flood suspended particulate matter (SPM). Material and methods Soil cores were sampled at inundated and non-inundated sites at a planned retention area. Soil was analyzed for hexachlorobenzene (HCB), polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) as well as for polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs). The highest inducing soil sample was fractionated applying a recently developed automated fractionation method to receive further insight into contaminant loads in soil at inundated sites. Impacts on biological scale were assessed using in vitro biotests for xenometabolic activity (7-ethoxyresorufin-o-deethylase (EROD) assay) as well as for mutagenic activity (Ames fluctuation assay). EROD induction was calculated as biological equivalent concentration (bio-TEQ), and mutagenic potentials were given as no observed effect concentration (NOEC) and maximum induction factor (IF_(max)). Results and discussion Soil core samples of each site induced EROD activity. However, extracts of soil sampled at a ground swale was by far the highest inducing (topsoil bio-TEQ= 41,000 pg/g). Further, chemical analysis yielded relative increases in concentration in particular: HCB (0.05 mg/kg), PCBs (0.19 mg/kg), and EPA-PAHs (39 mg/kg). Extracts of soil samples caused no mutagenic effects. PAHs caused the bulk of EROD activity (bio-TEQ= 32,000 pg/g) with ground swale topsoil fractions. Further, fractions containing moderately polar and polar substances gave elevated effects (bio-TEQ=8,200 pg/g). Mutagenic potentials were shown with most fractions. However, highest induction was observed with fractions containing moderately polar to polar substances reflected by a NOEC >0.03 mg/ml and an IF_(max) <29. Conclusions Soil contamination at floodplains is heterogeneous but may reach elevated levels with soil swales giving highest chemical concentrations and biological effects with total sample extracts and fractions. The origin of floodplain soil contamination can be evaluated using lines of evidence which may result in identification of contaminant transport path from sediment, via flood SPM to soil. Taking hazard assessment of floodplain soil forward to risk evaluation may indicate a concern which highlights the need to further investigate on hazards caused by eroded sediment in flood events to avoid conflicts of interest when planning and operating retention basins.
机译:目的进行这项研究是为了确定在洪水事件中河流中颗粒结合污染物对靠近公共井场的保留区的危害。重点是评估计划保留区的土壤污染。对土壤核心样品进行了化学和生物分析。对样品进行分级,以鉴定和比较土壤和洪水悬浮颗粒物(SPM)的污染物负荷和生物学效应。材料和方法在计划的保留区的淹没和未淹没地点对土壤核心进行采样。分析了土壤中的六氯苯(HCB),多氯联苯(PCB)以及多环芳烃(PAH)。使用最新开发的自动分馏方法对诱导最高的土壤样品进行分馏,以进一步了解淹没地点土壤中的污染物负荷。使用体外生物测试评估异物代谢活性(7-乙氧基间苯二酚-o-脱乙基酶(EROD)测定)以及诱变活性(Ames波动测定),从而评估对生物学规模的影响。 EROD诱导计算为生物等效浓度(bio-TEQ),诱变电位作为未观察到的作用浓度(NOEC)和最大诱导因子(IF_(max))给出。结果与讨论每个站点的土壤核心样品均引起EROD活性。但是,到目前为止,从地面沼泽取样的土壤提取物诱导率最高(表土生物TEQ = 41,000 pg / g)。此外,化学分析得出的浓度特别是相对增加:六氯代苯(0.05 mg / kg),多氯联苯(0.19 mg / kg)和EPA-PAHs(39 mg / kg)。土壤样品的提取物没有致突变作用。 PAHs引起大量的EROD活性(bio-TEQ = 32,000 pg / g),其中含有大量的地表水。此外,含有适度极性和极性物质的馏分具有增强的作用(bio-TEQ = 8,200 pg / g)。大多数部分都显示出诱变潜力。然而,在NOEC> 0.03 mg / ml和IF_(max)<29的情况下,观察到包含中等极性的物质的诱导率最高。结论洪泛区的土壤污染是异质性的,但随着土壤潮汐污染的增加,其化学浓度最高,总样品提取物和馏分的生物学效应最高。洪泛区土壤污染的起源可以使用证据来评估,这可能会导致污染物从泥沙通过洪水SPM到土壤的运输路径的识别。将洪泛区土壤的危害评估推进风险评估可能表明存在担忧,这突出表明有必要进一步研究洪水事件中侵蚀性沉积物造成的危害,以避免在规划和运营保留盆地时发生利益冲突。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Journal of soil & sediments》 |2011年第1期|p.82-92|共11页
  • 作者单位

    Department of Ecosystem Analysis, Institute for Environmental Research, RWTH Aachen University, Worringerweg 1, 52074 Aachen, Germany;

    Department of Effect-Directed Analyses, UFZ Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research, Permoserstrasse 15, 04318 Leipzig, Germany;

    Department of Effect-Directed Analyses, UFZ Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research, Permoserstrasse 15, 04318 Leipzig, Germany;

    Chemical Analysis Department, DVGW-Water Technology Center (TZW), Karlsruher Stra|3e 84, 76139 Karlsruhe, Germany;

    German Federal Institute for Hydrology, Am Mainzer Tor 1, 56068 Koblenz, Germany;

    Department of Effect-Directed Analyses, UFZ Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research, Permoserstrasse 15, 04318 Leipzig, Germany;

    Stadtwerke Karlsruhe GmbH (SWK), Daxlander Stra(3e 72, 76185 Karlsruhe, Germany;

    Department of Zoology, Aquatic Toxicology and Ecology Section, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 230, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany;

    Department of Ecosystem Analysis, Institute for Environmental Research, RWTH Aachen University, Worringerweg 1, 52074 Aachen, Germany;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    ames fluctuation assay; aryl hydrocarbon; receptor; dioxin-like; effect-directed analysis; EROD; assay; floodplain; mutagenic activity; soil;

    机译:阿姆斯波动分析芳基烃;受体类二恶英效果导向分析;EROD;化验洪泛区诱变活性;泥;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号