...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of soil & sediments >Use of optical and acoustic instruments to study the turbid plumes generated by three different types of dredges during dredging activities inside and outside of a port
【24h】

Use of optical and acoustic instruments to study the turbid plumes generated by three different types of dredges during dredging activities inside and outside of a port

机译:使用光学和声学仪器研究港口内外疏activities活动中三种不同类型的挖泥机产生的浑浊羽状物

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose The turbid plumes generated by different types of dredges have specific behaviours and diffusion patterns. The dredging of the Oil Port of Genoa Multedo (Italy) with three different dredges (grab, backhoe and trailing suction hopper) enabled us to study: the physical and hydrodynamic characteristics of the water column of the port and the area just outside it; the characteristics of the turbid plumes; and the different responses of our optical and acoustic instruments. Materials and methods In the dredging operations, a vessel equipped with a vertical acoustic Doppler current profiler and a conductivity-temperature-depth probe with a turbidimeter followed the different dredges during their daily operations. Using the acoustic backscatter and turbidity data acquired during the dredging phase, we investigated the turbidity variations caused by the dredging operations to study the evolution of the plume generated by the three different dredges. Results and discussion The grab plume was present only on the bottom up to a distance of 50 m from the grab, while at greater distances the turbidity fell to background values. The backhoe plume was present close to the bottom at a distance of 50 m from the dredging and, in the entire water column, at distances of 50-400 and 100 m inside and outside of the port, respectively. The trailing suction hopper dredge plume extended from the surface through the entire water column at distances from the dredging of 400 and 100 m inside and outside of the port, respectively. The highest values were found close to the bottom at distances from the dredging at 50 and 30 m inside and outside of the port, respectively. Conclusions The choice of a combined monitoring system is a good practical solution for studying the differences between the turbid plumes created by the three dredging tools (grab, backhoe and trailing suction hopper dredge) under different hydrodynamic conditions. Furthermore, two different types of instrument should give complementary information on different aspects of sediment resuspension during a dredging operation.
机译:目的由不同类型的挖泥机产生的浑浊羽状流具有特定的行为和扩散方式。用三个不同的挖泥机(抓斗,挖土机和牵引式吸料斗)对热那亚穆尔多多(意大利)的石油港进行疏enabled,使我们能够进行以下研究:港口水柱及其外围区域的物理和水动力特性;浑浊的烟羽的特征;以及我们的光学和声学仪器的不同响应。材料和方法在挖泥作业中,配备有垂直声多普勒电流剖面仪和带浊度计的电导率-温度-深度探头的船只在日常作业中会遵循不同的挖泥船。利用在疏ed阶段获得的声波反向散射和浊度数据,我们研究了由疏operations操作引起的浊度变化,以研究三种不同疏edge产生的羽流的演变。结果与讨论抓斗羽流仅出现在距抓斗50 m的底部,而在更大的距离处,浊度降至背景值。反铲羽流位于距离挖泥机50 m处的底部附近,并且在整个水柱中,分别位于港口内外50-400和100 m处。尾部吸料斗疏edge气柱从地面延伸穿过整个水柱,疏from距离分别为港口内外疏m 400 m和100 m。在距港口内外50m和30m处距挖泥船距离较近的底部发现了最高值。结论选择组合监测系统是研究在不同水动力条件下三种挖泥工具(抓斗,反铲和尾随吸料斗挖泥机)产生的浊羽之间差异的一个很好的实用解决方案。此外,两种不同类型的仪器应在挖泥作业期间提供有关泥沙再悬浮不同方面的补充信息。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号