...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of socio-economics >What drives charitable donations of time and money? The roles of political ideology, religiosity, and involvement
【24h】

What drives charitable donations of time and money? The roles of political ideology, religiosity, and involvement

机译:是什么推动了时间和金钱的慈善捐赠?政治意识形态,宗教信仰和参与的作用

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

We use data from the first wave of the Panel Study on American Religion and Ethnicity to estimate a multivariate sample selection model of charitable giving of time and money highlighting the roles of political ideology, religiosity, political and social involvement, and diversity in personal relationships while controlling for other factors commonly identified in the scholarly work on philanthropic behavior. Our findings provide no evidence that political conservatives are more charitable than political liberals as advanced by Brooks (2006). To the contrary, our results suggest that at least in terms of volunteering, political conservatives are less charitable than political liberals. We also find evidence that the adverse impacts of political conservatism on charitable behavior are exacerbated by the increasing importance of religion/religious faith in one's life. These results, together with robust findings of significant and positive independent effects of other participation, involvement, and diversity variables, imply that charitable actions are both practice-driven and ideology-driven and somewhat at odds with the findings of Vaidyanathan et al. (2011).
机译:我们使用来自美国宗教与种族问题小组研究的第一波数据来估计慈善捐赠时间和金钱的多元样本选择模型,强调了政治意识形态,宗教信仰,政治和社会参与以及人际关系多样化中的作用控制在慈善行为学术研究中通常确定的其他因素。我们的发现没有证据表明政治保守主义者比布鲁克斯(2006)提出的政治自由主义者更慈善。相反,我们的结果表明,至少就志愿服务而言,政治保守派比政治自由派不那么慈善。我们还发现有证据表明,宗教/宗教信仰在人们生活中的重要性日益增加,政治保守主义对慈善行为的不利影响更加严重。这些结果以及其他参与,参与和多样性变量对重大和积极的独立影响的可靠发现表明,慈善行为既是实践驱动的,也是意识形态驱动的,与Vaidyanathan等人的发现有些矛盾。 (2011)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号